US Rates Strategy DailyDéjà V/U Revisited
中文标题
美国利率策略日报 · 再访V/U比值
Core conclusion · Tlines extraction
SMBC revisits the gap between labor demand (job openings to unemployed workers) and wage growth, noting labor demand bottomed in late 2025 and rebounded in 2026 while wage growth decelerated linearly. Early indications suggest the gap may be closing, with the Atlanta Fed median wage growth series reaccelerating to 4.1% y/y in August. If this pattern broadens across other wage measures, a key source of disinflationary pressure would be removed from the Fed's calculus.
- Institution
- SMBC
- Published
- 09/23/2026
- Research topic
- Fed Policy
- Time horizon
- 2025
Key arguments
- Labor demand bottomed in late 2025 and rebounded markedly in 2026, while wage growth decelerated linearly, indicating a softening job market.
- Early indications suggest the gap between labor demand and wage growth may be closing, with wage growth better aligning with labor demand.
- The Atlanta Fed's median wage growth series reaccelerated to 4.1% y/y in August.
- If this pattern becomes broadly evident across other wage measures, a key source of economy-wide disinflationary pressure would be removed from the Fed's rate-setting calculus.
Key numbers
- Atlanta Fed median wage growth (August, y/y)
- 4.1%
Main risks
- The pattern may not become broadly evident across other wage measures.
- The reacceleration of wage growth could be temporary or revised.
- The gap between labor demand and wage growth may not close as indicated by early signs.
Corresponding source evidence
Labor demand — proxied by the ratio of job openings to unemployed workers — hit a hard bottom in late 2025 before rebounding markedly this year, while estimates of wage growth continued to decelerate linearly, which generally indicates a softening job market.
· 2025Early indications, however, suggest this gap may be closing with wage growth better aligning with labor demand (shown below), as the Atlanta Fed’s median wage growth series has reaccelerated to 4.1% y/y (August).
Should this pattern become more broadly evident across other wage measures, a key source of economy-wide disinflationary pressure would be removed from t he Fed’s rate -setting calculus.
Context: the conclusion is Tlines' automated extraction, not the institution's wording. Quoted evidence is publisher wording. Scope and date must travel with the conclusion.
Verify at the original source ↗Loading the document…
AI analysis
Cross-institution comparison · FED
| Institution / report | Published | Direction | Source-checked target | Horizon |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMBCUS Rates Strategy Daily · Déjà V/U Revisited | 09/23/2026 | Neutral | — | Not stated |
| Saxo BankMarket Quick Take - Chipmakers extend their slide as Brent holds above 107 | 10/19/2026 | Neutral | — | Not stated |
| Commonwealth BankCommBank economists stick with November RBA interest rates call | 10/19/2026 | Neutral | — | Not stated |
| Westpac / Westpac IQ'Australia and NZ Weekly' | 10/18/2026 | Neutral | — | Not stated |
How this page was produced
Tlines extracted the conclusion, arguments, numbers and risks above from the report published by SMBC on 09/23/2026, then structured them for comparison. The publisher's own wording is reachable through the source link on this page and is displayed in full above. Last updated 10/17/2026. Methodology · Source policy · AI usage · Request a correction