We have struggled throughout the year to decouple short-term interest rate expectations from moves in global energy markets and this month has been no different.
Global fixed income: the struggle to decouple
中文标题
全球固定收益:脱钩之艰难
Core conclusion · Tlines extraction
Schroders says fixed income struggled to decouple from energy-driven rate expectations. Hawkish Fed, BoC, RBA and ECB comments after Jackson Hole flattened curves. They raised the 'too hot' scenario (3+ Fed hikes) to 35%, kept 'warming up' (a couple of hikes) at 50%, and cut 'just right' (no hikes) to 15%. Eurozone yields look attractive but energy is a falling knife; gilts and global corporate credit downgraded to negative.
- Institution
- Schroders
- Published
- 09/17/2026
- Research topic
- Fed Policy · Inflation
- Time horizon
- this month
Key arguments
- Policymakers' patience with above-target inflation is nearing its limit, shifting bond markets hawkish and flattening curves.
- Energy price repricing is the dominant driver in European fixed income and is turning Schroders more cautious on European growth.
- Eurozone bond valuations are becoming attractive, but without stable or peaking energy prices a short-term top in yields is hard to call.
- Global corporate bonds (investment grade and high yield) are downgraded to negative; emerging market hard currency debt and US agency MBS remain preferred.
Key numbers
- Fed 'too hot' scenario probability (3+ hikes)
- 35%
- Fed 'warming up' scenario probability (a couple of hikes)
- 50%
- Fed 'just right' scenario probability (no hikes)
- 15%
- Fed rate hike delivered 16 September
- expected by Schroders and market
- ECB hikes already delivered / priced further
- 2 delivered, 3 more priced
Main risks
- Energy prices staying elevated would hurt manufacturing and consumer real incomes, especially in Europe.
- Policymakers may become more intolerant of above-target inflation, extending the hawkish repricing.
- Eurozone bond yields could keep rising if energy prices do not peak or stabilise.
Corresponding source evidence
These comments came most notably from US Federal Reserve (Fed) chair Kevin Warsh at the Jackson Hole symposium, but also subsequently from the Bank of Canada, the Reserve Bank of Australia and the European Central Bank (ECB) – all suggesting their patience for above-target inflation is reaching its limit.
With this in mind, we have increased our probabilities of our "too hot" scenario - where the Fed raises rates 3+ times – to 35% this month.
· this monthOur modal outcome is our "warming up" scenario (now 50%) - a more modest adjustment with a couple of hikes from the Fed, and we significantly downgrade the chances of the Fed not tightening at all – in our parlance, "just right" - to 15%.
Context: the conclusion is Tlines' automated extraction, not the institution's wording. Quoted evidence is publisher wording. Scope and date must travel with the conclusion.
Verify at the original source ↗Authors
The last month has been a difficult one for fixed income markets. A potent cocktail for weakness in global bonds has been created by the recent upward move in energy prices, coupled with comments from several central banks.
These comments came most notably from US Federal Reserve (Fed) chair Kevin Warsh at the Jackson Hole symposium, but also subsequently from the Bank of Canada, the Reserve Bank of Australia and the European Central Bank (ECB) – all suggesting their patience for above-target inflation is reaching its limit. The impact has been most acute at the short end of the yield curve (0-5 years) that are most directly linked to central bank policy action.
It is clear the persistence of the inflation shock and the growing intolerance towards it from policymakers has shifted bond markets in a more hawkish direction. With this in mind, we have increased our probabilities of our "too hot" scenario - where the Fed raises rates 3+ times – to 35% this month. Our modal outcome is our "warming up" scenario (now 50%) - a more modest adjustment with a couple of hikes from the Fed, and we significantly downgrade the chances of the Fed not tightening at all – in our parlance, "just right" - to 15%.
Our scenarios – reflecting a warmer macro backdrop
We are of the view that moderate tightening is needed by the Fed. We don’t see the inflation problem as out of control - the overshoot is modest, wages remain benign, and broadly inflation expectations remain well-anchored - but we think some restriction is merited to curb demand. The Fed delivered the 16 September rate hike we and the market expected, given latest inflation data.
All else equal, an engaged central bank dealing with the inflation problem is relatively positive for longer-dated bonds as inflation-fighting credibility is restored. However, this comes at the expense of higher shorter maturity yields. The yield curve has flattened aggressively in recent weeks as the odds of Fed tightening have increased, and while tactically a pause from this fierce move wouldn’t be a surprise, we believe strategically this global flattening trend has legs.
Outside of the US, the main story has been the sharp repricing higher of energy prices, and this has shown up no more starkly than in European fixed income markets. It has been by far the dominant factor in the recent repricing higher of UK, German and other eurozone markets.
We are turning more cautious on European growth as a result. Although we don’t believe the outlook is catastrophic, higher energy prices will hurt both the manufacturing sector and consumer real incomes if they remain at these elevated levels.
This weaker growth outlook, in combination with a market pricing a further three hikes for the ECB from here (having already delivered two), means that strategically eurozone bond valuations are now beginning to look attractive. But this has been a falling-knife market. Unless and until we see some stability - as the bare minimum- or a clear peak in energy prices, it is hard to call a short-term top in eurozone yields.
In other words, having largely avoided them in recent months, German Bunds are back on our radar but we’re not quite ready to pull the trigger yet. On the other hand, we remain cautious on the UK and have downgraded gilts to negative. The Bank of England has maintained a dovish disposition, given the lack of second round effects, but this feels increasingly vulnerable to the same bout of energy shock intolerance we are witnessing from its peers.
Turning to asset allocation, we have struggled with corporate bond valuations for a number of months. By almost any metric, credit spreads (the premium paid to investors to take additional credit risk) are tight. Very tight. But with a positive macro backdrop, we maintained a neutral stance despite these unattractive valuations. However, with signs the macro backdrop, especially in Europe, may become more difficult due to tighter monetary policy and the energy impact on real incomes, we believe it is now appropriate to downgrade corporate bonds globally - both investment grade and high-yield – to negative.
We remain more positive on emerging market hard currency bonds, especially Hungary, while also seeing opportunities in US agency mortgage-backed securities.
Learn more about investing in Schroders’ Fixed Income Funds.
This document is issued by Schroder Investment Management Australia Limited (ABN 22 000 443 274, AFSL 226473) (Schroders). It is intended solely for wholesale clients (as defined under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)) and is not suitable for distribution to retail clients. This document does not contain and should not be taken as containing any financial product advice or financial product recommendations. This document does not take into consideration any recipient’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Before making any decision relating to a Schroders fund, you should obtain and read a copy of the product disclosure statement available at www.schroders.com.au or other relevant disclosure document for that fund and consider the appropriateness of the fund to your objectives, financial situation and needs. You should also refer to the target market determination for the fund at www.schroders.com.au. All investments carry risk, and the repayment of capital and performance in any of the funds named in this document are not guaranteed by Schroders or any company in the Schroders Group. The material contained in this document is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice. Schroders does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information which is contained in this document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Schroders, every company in the Schroders plc group, and their respective directors, officers, employees, consultants and agents exclude all liability (however arising) for any direct or indirect loss or damage that may be suffered by the recipient or any other person in connection with this document. Opinions, estimates and projections contained in this document reflect the opinions of the authors as at the date of this document and are subject to change without notice. “Forward-looking” information, such as forecasts or projections, are not guarantees of any future performance and there is no assurance that any forecast or projection will be realised. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. All references to securities, sectors, regions and/or countries are made for illustrative purposes only and are not to be construed as recommendations to buy, sell or hold. Telephone calls and other electronic communications with Schroders representatives may be recorded.
Preview PDF
Loading the document…
AI analysis
Cross-institution comparison · FED
| Institution / report | Published | Direction | Source-checked target | Horizon |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SchrodersGlobal fixed income: the struggle to decouple | 09/17/2026 | Strong bearish | — | Not stated |
| Westpac / Westpac IQ'Australia and NZ Weekly' | 10/18/2026 | Neutral | — | Not stated |
| NatixisInflation Rises, Rates Ease | 10/16/2026 | Neutral | — | Not stated |
| SMBCUS Macroeconomics · Joseph Lavorgna 2026 2027 2026 2027 | 10/16/2026 | Bullish | — | 2027 Q2 |
How this page was produced
Tlines extracted the conclusion, arguments, numbers and risks above from the report published by Schroders on 09/17/2026, then structured them for comparison. The publisher's own wording is reachable through the source link on this page. Last updated 10/17/2026. Methodology · Source policy · AI usage · Request a correction