We changed our fed and ecb call
中文标题
我们改变了美联储和欧洲央行的预期
Core conclusion · Tlines extraction
ING now expects both the ECB and Fed to hike rates once more in December, after hawkish September decisions. The shared driver is an energy supply shock with limited knock-on effects so far, weighed against memories of 2022. The Fed hike would bring a 4.25% peak; the ECB move is framed as an insurance hike. ING also lifts its end-year US 10-year yield forecast above 5%.
- Institution
- ING THINK
- Published
- 09/18/2026
- Research topic
- US 10Y Treasury · Fed Policy · Inflation
- Time horizon
- 2027 · this year
Key arguments
- Both central banks face the same dilemma: an energy-driven supply shock with limited knock-on effects so far, set against memories of the delayed 2022 response.
- The Fed is increasingly focused on accelerating inflation convergence to 2%, worried Middle East conflict keeps energy components elevated.
- Unless September jobs and inflation data are very hot, the Fed likely waits until 9 December rather than 28 October, given proximity to the 3 November midterms.
- The ECB's subdued hawkishness, with headline inflation below 2% only in Q4 2027, pushes it toward a pre-year-end insurance hike.
Key numbers
- Fed terminal rate forecast
- 4.25%
- US 10-year yield end-2026 forecast
- above 5%
- Extreme scenario US 10-year range
- 5.25%-5.5%
- EUR/USD year-end forecast
- 1.160
- Oil price condition
- above $100/bbl
Main risks
- If energy prices stay higher into 2027 or knock-on effects materialise faster, both central banks could be forced to hike further.
- An October Fed hike combined with an oil price jump could push EUR/USD toward 1.140 and test the 1.132 June lows.
- The ECB's insurance hike risks unwarranted damage to an economy whose 0.3-0.4% quarterly growth estimates look optimistic.
Corresponding source evidence
We now also expect the US 10-year yield to end the year above 5% Fed Chair Kevin Warsh and ECB President Christine Lagarde.
Wednesday's Fed meeting and last week's ECB meeting have shown us that both central banks are not likely to follow the very dovish path we anticipated.
The much longer-lasting war in the Middle East has not only pushed energy prices to new highs, but also increased the risk that inflation could spread more broadly in the economy.
Context: the conclusion is Tlines' automated extraction, not the institution's wording. Quoted evidence is publisher wording. Scope and date must travel with the conclusion.
Verify at the original source ↗Loading the document…
AI analysis
Cross-institution comparison · US10Y
| Institution / report | Published | Direction | Source-checked target | Horizon |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ING THINKWe changed our fed and ecb call | 09/18/2026 | Bullish | — | end-2026 |
| NatixisInflation Rises, Rates Ease | 10/16/2026 | Bullish | — | Not stated |
| SMBCUS Macroeconomics · Joseph Lavorgna 2026 2027 2026 2027 | 10/16/2026 | Neutral | — | 2027 Q4 |
| SMBCUS Rates Strategy Daily · An [AI]nflationary Buildout | 10/16/2026 | Bearish | — | Not stated |
How this page was produced
Tlines extracted the conclusion, arguments, numbers and risks above from the report published by ING THINK on 09/18/2026, then structured them for comparison. The publisher's own wording is reachable through the source link on this page and is displayed in full above. Last updated 10/17/2026. Methodology · Source policy · AI usage · Request a correction