US MacroeconomicsJoseph Lavorgna 2026 2027 2026 2027
中文标题
美国宏观经济 · Joseph Lavorgna 2026 2027 2026 2027
Core conclusion · Tlines extraction
SMBC's US economist forecasts a sharp Q3 2026 growth spike to 5.0% annualized, followed by a Q4 slowdown to 0.7%, with core PCE at 3.1% year over year through 2026. Unemployment drifts to 4.0% by 2027. The rates strategy team expects one more 25bp hike in 2026 to a 4.50%-4.75% funds target, no hikes in 2027, and the 10-year yield peaking near 4.80% in Q3 2026 before easing to 4.50%.
- Institution
- SMBC
- Published
- 09/22/2026
- Research topic
- Not explicitly stated
- Time horizon
- Not explicitly stated
Key arguments
- Real GDP growth is forecast to spike to 5.0% annualized in Q3 2026 before decelerating to 0.7% in Q4, implying volatile quarterly momentum.
- Core PCE inflation stays at or above 3.1% year over year through 2026, only easing to 2.2% by Q4 2027.
- The rates strategy team looks for one additional 25bp hike in 2026 to a 4.50%-4.75% target range, then no hikes in 2027.
- The 10-year Treasury yield is projected to peak at 4.80% in Q3 2026 and settle at 4.50% through 2027.
Key numbers
- Q3 2026 real GDP (q/q, ar)
- 5.0%
- Q4 2026 real GDP (q/q, ar)
- 0.7%
- Core PCE 2026 Q4/Q4
- 3.1%
- Fed funds upper bound end-2026
- 4.75%
- 10-year Treasury Q3 2026
- 4.80%
Main risks
- Forecast is based on assumptions and parameters that are not the only ones that could be selected; no guarantee of accuracy, completeness or reasonableness.
- Views may differ from other SMBC research; trading desks may hold inconsistent positions and the document is not a research report.
- Quarterly GDP path is unusually volatile (5.0% then 0.7%), so the Q3 spike could prove temporary or overstated.
Corresponding source evidence
No sentence-level evidence was extracted; verify the report directly.
Context: the conclusion is Tlines' automated extraction, not the institution's wording. Quoted evidence is publisher wording. Scope and date must travel with the conclusion.
Verify at the original source ↗Loading the document…
AI analysis
How this page was produced
Tlines extracted the conclusion, arguments, numbers and risks above from the report published by SMBC on 09/22/2026, then structured them for comparison. The publisher's own wording is reachable through the source link on this page and is displayed in full above. Last updated 10/17/2026. Methodology · Source policy · AI usage · Request a correction