Consider an investor who starts with $10 million in a 150/50 tax-aware long-short strategy. Beginning at the end of year two, the investor withdraws capital annually, with each withdrawal sized according to how much the portfolio can accommodate while preserving high exposure to the underlying alpha model and managing capital gain realization. The exhibit below shows that, across our simulations, those withdrawals totaled about $10.2 million on average by the end of year ten. Importantly, that is the cumulative amount withdrawn over time, not a liquidation of the original $10 million; portfolio growth allows cumulative withdrawals to potentially exceed the amount initially invested.
The same analysis produced average cumulative withdrawals of approximately $12.4 million for a 200/100 strategy and $13.9 million for a 250/150 strategy, assuming the same $10 million starting investment. In general, tax-efficient withdrawal capacity increases with the tracking error and leverage of the strategy.
Simulated Cumulative Withdrawals from Tax-Aware Long-Short Strategies ($)
Source: AQR. We model three long-short strategies—150/50, 200/100, and 250/150. All strategies are constructed over the Russell 1000 Index universe, use the Russell 1000 Index as the benchmark, and target a beta of 1.0 to this benchmark. The long-short strategies target tracking errors (TEs) of 2%, 4%, and 6% to the benchmark, respectively. The strategies are rebalanced monthly. All dividend income is assumed to be reinvested until the investor makes a withdrawal. Pre-tax returns are computed net of transaction costs and financing costs and gross of management fees. See Liberman et al. (2023) for more details.
However, liquidity needs do not always arrive on a schedule. An investor may instead face a large, one-time expense or another unexpected need for cash. Here, too, the simulations suggest meaningful available capital. For example, a one-time tax-efficient withdrawal from a 150/50 strategy averaged as much as 43% of initial capital after two years. Again, higher-leverage strategies generally supported larger withdrawals. The paper emphasizes that, in all these scenarios, the strategy preserves its pre-tax characteristics—pre-tax return, tracking error, and leverage.