II 全球机构情报
施罗德 · 2026/09/03

SAHYCF评论:稳步前行

前往官网原文 ↗
可引用研究简报

一句话结论

施罗德澳大利亚高收益信用基金2026年8月评论指出,一级市场发行量创纪录导致饱和,利差走阔,但对信用利差收益保持建设性看法。报告讨论了Alphabet创纪录的55亿澳元超大规模交易的影响、各区域强劲的盈利季、私募信贷的担忧,并表达了对澳大利亚主要银行二级资本债券作为年底交易的信心,尽管短期内供应消化不良。

机构
施罗德
发布时间
2026/09/03
时间范围
year-end · until supply pause · short-term · medium-term
关键数字:八月发行量 $250亿; 彭博澳债信用0+指数利差变化 +2个基点; Alphabet发行规模 A$55亿; Google 20年期发行利差 180个基点; NextEra次级债规模 A$13亿; SSE首次澳元债规模 A$10亿; Coles债券规模 A$5亿; Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group首次发行规模 A$2亿
主要风险:由于持续供应(包括潜在的亚马逊交易),利差进一步走阔的风险。; 澳大利亚房地产市场快速恶化影响消费支出和信贷质量的风险。; 私募信贷问题蔓延影响更广泛投资者投资组合的风险。; 如果供应仍然沉重,澳大利亚主要银行二级资本债券表现落后的风险持续。; 零售银行混合资本债到期时流动性下降的风险。
条件 / 失效条件:如果供应持续且亚马逊交易实现

上下文:这是 Tlines 对公开机构研报的自动结构化结果,并非机构原话;引用结论时须同时保留上述机构与日期范围。

在原始来源核验 ↗
完整研报正文
完整中文译文

SAHYCF评论:稳步前行

随着8月份发行量达到$25亿,市场感觉股票供应饱和,但交易仍获得超额认购。

真是多事的一个月!年度企业发行量现已超过2025年的创纪录水平,而今年还剩4个月;随着市场消化大规模交易,利差表现疲软;我们首笔澳元超大规模发行;企业财报季;以及澳大利亚私募债务领域十多年来不良贷款和投资实践的暴露。这个月有太多话题可以与您探讨。所以,请系好安全带,我们开始吧……

8月份供应量大增导致利差表现疲软。尽管彭博澳债信用0+指数月底仅走阔2 basis points个基点,但券商报价感觉沉重,买价低于标价,表明市场消化不良。

部分原因是澳大利亚首笔超大规模交易——Alphabet发行的$5.5亿。尽管该债券自发行以来表现优异约6bp个基点,但我们看到长期次级债券表现落后,主要由于投资者从主要银行长期债券(当时交易在131bp个基点左右)转向新发行的谷歌20年期债券(发行利差180bp个基点),两者信用评级差异为:主要银行次级债A-,谷歌AA-。虽然这种转换合情合理,但长期限T2供应激增,导致曲线后端表现落后。这引发了一些更广泛的信用传染,堪培拉数据中心也定价走阔10bp个基点。

除了谷歌之外,还有国内银行发行的次级债券($3.5亿)、其他金融优先债($9.5亿)以及大量企业债。NextEra再次登场,这家[非常]大型的美国电力公用事业公司发行了A$1.3亿的次级债券,定价比我们看到的公允价值高出20bp个基点。我们还看到英国公用事业公司SSE($1亿)的首次澳元发行,Coles再次发行($500百万),最后纽卡斯尔煤炭基础设施集团进行了规模适中的澳元首秀($200百万),初始利差为160bp个基点,因交易获9倍超额认购,收窄至142bp个基点。继纽卡斯尔港于2025年首次发行AMTN和怀特黑文煤矿今年发行144亿之后,此前不受青睐的煤炭及煤炭相关资产如今似乎“时髦”起来。

账簿统计总是引人入胜。正如预期,我们看到亚洲投资者对纽卡斯尔煤炭基础设施和SSE的强劲需求(占账簿的30-40%)。更令人惊讶的是,Coles也吸引了40%的总需求来自同一买家群体。这有点出乎意料,因为亚洲需求通常被我们市场中利差较高的发行人所吸引。这可能预示着投资者策略的转变,现在更愿意参与低贝塔、低利差的发行。例外是NextEra次级债券发行,亚洲投资者参与比例低得惊人(低于-10%),考虑到NextEra的全球发行人地位、有吸引力的新发行折价以及超过7%的票息(通常对外国买家来说是三个绿灯),这出乎意料。

澳大利亚公司交出稳健的成绩单

澳大利亚的业绩报告季总体表现尚可;然而,多速经济的特征显露无遗。资源、基础设施及数据中心相关投资周期的公司普遍表现积极,银行和必需消费品公司相对中性,而依赖非必需消费支出或对利率较为敏感的公司则对前景更为谨慎。进入本财年(27)的交易更新确实有所放缓,但并未表明房地产市场引发的经济活动完全崩溃。

其中较大的意外来自Stockland和Mirvac,它们的业绩反驳了住宅市场疲软可能导致27财年盈利困境的担忧。对于银行而言,后视镜里的景象强劲,但透过挡风玻璃看前景却有些模糊。我们并不预测资产质量会迅速恶化或盈利大幅下滑,但信贷增长预计将放缓至低个位数,且越来越多的证据表明,抵押贷款持有人正在收紧支出,尽管净储蓄家庭(无债务家庭)仍在自由消费。CBA提到,他们目前在其资本目标区间内运营(而非高于该区间),股东应预期股息支付率将有所收敛。围绕负扣税和资本利得的税收变化,在可预见的未来对大型银行在住房投资领域的贷款施加了限制。

从信用投资者的角度来看,低增长环境并非可怕的情形。在就业稳定和信贷增长放缓至低至中个位数的情况下,信用利差有望享受较低波动的环境。值得注意的是,指数中约一半的发行人是私营企业,因此盈利更新将持续到九月份。同时,来自美国、欧洲和亚洲的Kangaroo发行人数量也在不断增加。

  • 美国 earnings season表现“强劲”而不仅仅是“尚可”,在投资级和高收益市场中,超出预期的公司比例非常高。虽然与人工智能相关的投资仍是主导主题,但盈利增长也扩展到了金融、工业、材料和能源领域。
  • 欧洲带来正面惊喜。虽然能源仍是主要贡献者,但盈利增长已扩展至金融、科技和工业领域。随着业绩报告季的推进,STOXX 600 的盈利增长预期有所改善,这表明分析师低估了企业的韧性。
  • 在亚洲,科技权重较大的市场(台湾/韩国)以及北亚出口商表现领先,而中国国内经济仍然低迷,拖累了其他地区。在澳大利亚信贷市场发行的亚洲发行人主要是该地区的系统重要性银行,它们的盈利在这一方面非常稳健。

私人债务问题继续按我们预期的发展

我们本月在评论中提及私人债务,不仅是为了提高对该资产类别所面临问题的认识,也是为了强调,尽管高收益领域的一些同行投资于私人贷款和结构化信贷以支持其业绩和波动率指标,但施罗德高收益信贷基金并不投资于这些资产。

除非你与世隔绝,否则不可能错过私人信贷市场近期引起媒体和监管广泛关注的一些动态。总部位于悉尼的开发商Bathla Group的倒闭,凸显了与某些私人信贷敞口相关的风险。过去十年,该资产类别快速增长,加上对透明度、治理和风险管理实践的担忧,引发了一些问题,而这些问题如今正变得更加突出。在这些做法盛行之处,它们凸显了零售投资者资本保障不足的风险。

在4年2025季度,ASIC发布了一份报告,指出澳大利亚私人信贷市场存在的问题,包括披露和透明度不足、营销不当、费用、治理、估值实践、流动性和信用风险管理等方面。因此,多项停止令被发布,并引发了更广泛的行业行动呼吁。自那以来,一些基金限制了赎回或暂停分红,进一步加剧了投资者对该行业的关注。

一些基金表示,限制赎回旨在“保护”其现有投资者。我们认为,对投资者资本最有效的风险缓解应发生在事前——在承销、信用研究、估值和定价阶段——而不是在贷款质量迅速恶化之时。我们认为,这些事件可能只是早期迹象而非孤立事件,我们此后担心的是对投资者投资组合的传染效应,尤其是对那些对该市场部分领域风险理解有限的投资者。

与私人信贷相比,公共信贷在更透明、更受监管的市场结构中运作,监管严格,具有独立的每日市场定价、完全透明和每日流动性,并且不是集中于与房地产相关的贷款,也不是由可疑的商业地产资产支持。我们投资于高质量的企业和基础设施发行人,如墨尔本机场、Ausnet和APA。此外,随着过去4年基准利率的上升,私募信贷与公共信贷回报之间的差距已显著收窄,我们认为投资者应仔细评估,私募信贷所提供的增量回报是否足以抵消在流动性、质量和透明度方面的权衡。

市场展望

考虑到持续的新债发行管道,包括ElectraNet、Aurizon、ARTC、Lotteries Corporation以及可能于9月发行的Amazon,我们并不预期利差会有显著反弹。总体而言,我们预计情况将与之前类似:利差维持区间波动,但提供高质量的持有收益。此外,未来两个月内,超过A$2亿澳元的澳大利亚零售银行混合资本工具将到期。持有这些证券的投资者应现在就开始审查再投资方案,因为这些证券的价格将回归面值,流动性也可能恶化。

我们提及这一点,是因为我们的年终核心交易仍是澳大利亚主要银行Tier 2,,该品种本月跑输于超大规模的Alphabet发行。然而,混合资本工具的投资者基础,除了直接零售投资者外,大部分是被动型的,加上那些有义务购买澳大利亚主要银行次级债的主动型基金,它们为Tier 2证券提供了结构性需求池。鉴于今年预计几乎不会有进一步的Tier 2发行,我们预计这一需求基础将吸收剩余的现有存量。

投资组合更新

面对众多待发行的交易,你可能会认为我们选择众多,但新发行让利幅度差异很大,估值纪律仍然至关重要。在指数层面,由于本月供应过剩导致利差走阔,估值已有所改善。随着市场传闻Amazon交易即将推出,我们预计至少在供应暂停、市场有机会消化发行量之前,利差将继续表现不佳。

我们偏好的板块之一是公用事业,因为这些资产基本面稳固、现金流可预测且监管环境有利。然而,随着NextEra交易带来丰厚的发行溢价,像Transgrid这样的名字表现不佳,这不幸地对我们的业绩造成了影响。话虽如此,我们对该标的信心很高,并将在利差走阔时考虑增加仓位。由于后续没有明显的高收益交易管道,随着NextEra发行的消化,非金融企业次级债看起来有望反弹。

投资组合在41个不同发行人和79个单独证券上保持良好分散。我们仍然认为,在当前系统中蕴含的地缘政治和市场风险水平上升的情况下,集中于少量发行人的投资组合面临表现不佳的风险。

了解更多关于施罗德澳大利亚高收益信用基金或施罗德澳大利亚高收益信用基金(主动型ETF)的投资信息。

完整英文原文

With $25bn of issuance in August, markets are feeling saturated with stock but deals remain oversubscribed.

What a month! Annual corporate issuance has now exceeded 2025’s record year, with 4 months of the year still remaining; soggy spread performance as the market comes to terms with bumper deals; our first AUD Hyperscaler issue; corporate reporting season; and the unravelling of more than a decade of poor lending and investment practices in Australian private debt. There is no shortage of things to discuss with you this month. So, hang on to your hats, here we go…

Heavy supply in August led to soggy spread performance. While the Bloomberg Ausbond Credit 0+ Index was only 2 basis points (bps) wider by month’s end, broker axes have felt heavy and bids are wider than marked, indicating considerable indigestion.

Part of the reason for this was the $5.5bn of issuance from our first Hyperscaler deal in Australia, Alphabet. While the bond has outperformed by circa 6bps since issuance, we saw long-dated Tier 2 underperformance led by the switching from longer dated major bank paper trading around 131bps (at the time) versus the new Google 20 year issued at 180bps with a credit rating differential of A- for major bank sub-debt versus AA- for Google. While the switch made sense, it flooded the market with long-end T2 supply triggering underperformance at the back end of the curve. This led to some broader contagion across the credit landscape with Canberra Data Centres also pricing 10bps wider.

Beyond Google was a quick burst of Tier 2 bonds from domestic banks ($3.5b), a swathe of other financial senior debt ($9.5b), and a healthy dose of corporates. NextEra paid a return visit, the [very] large US electricity utility issued A$1.3b of subordinated debt and printed 20bps wide of where we saw fair value. We also had a debut A$ print from United Kingdom utility company SSE ($1b), a revisit from Coles ($500m), and finally Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group chipped in for a modestly sized A$ debut ($200m), which had an initial spread of 160bps, tightening to 142bps as the deal was 9x oversubscribed. Following Port of Newcastle’s Inaugural AMTN in 2025 and Whitehaven Coal’s 144a issue this year, previously unloved coal and coal-related assets now appear to be “en vogue”.

The book statistics always make for interesting reading. As expected, we saw a strong Asian bid (30-40% of the book) for Newcastle Coal Infrastructure and SSE. More surprisingly, Coles also drew 40% of overall demand from the same buyer-base. This is a little off-piste as Asian demand is typically lured by the punchier spread issuers in our market. This could signal a shift in approach, with investors now more willing to participate in lower-beta, lower-spread issuance. The outlier was the subordinated NextEra offering, with a surprisingly low sub-10% Asian bid – which was unexpected given NextEra's global issuer status, an attractive new issue concession, and a coupon above 7%, typically three green lights for foreign buyers.

A solid report card for Australian companies

Australia's reporting season was respectable in aggregate; however, the multi-speed economy was on display. Companies exposed to Resources, Infrastructure and the investment cycle around Data Centres were broadly positive and Banks and Consumer staples relatively neutral, while companies reliant on discretionary consumer spending or those a little more sensitive to interest rates were more cautious in their outlooks. Trading updates to start FY27 were certainly softer but did not point to a complete collapse in activity brought on by the housing market.

Among the bigger surprises were Stockland and Mirvac, whose results belied concerns that the weakness in residential housing could cause an FY27 earnings headache. For the banks, the picture looks strong in the rear-view mirror but somewhat cloudier through the windscreen. We are not forecasting a rapid deterioration in asset quality or a significant earnings decline, but credit growth is tipped to slow to low-single digits, with increasing evidence that mortgage holders are tightening their belts, even as net-saver households (those with no debt) continue spending freely. CBA mentioned that they are now operating within their capital target range (not above) and shareholders should expect the dividend payout ratio to temper. Tax changes around negative gearing and capital gains have put a handbrake on big bank lending in the housing investment sector for the foreseeable future.

From a credit investor perspective, a low-growth environment is not a terrible scenario. With steady employment and credit growth slowing to low-to-mid single digits, credit spreads can conceivably enjoy a lower-volatility setting. It’s worth noting that around half the issuers in the index are privately owned, so earnings updates will continue to flow right through September. There is also an increasing cohort of Kangaroo issuers from the US, Europe and Asia.

  • US earnings season was ‘strong’ rather than merely ‘respectable’, with a very high proportion of companies beating expectations in both IG and HY markets. While AI-related investment remains the dominant theme, earnings strength also extended to financials, industrials, materials and energy.
  • Europe surprised positively. While energy remained a major contributor, earnings growth extended to financials, technology and industrials. STOXX 600 earnings growth expectations improved as the reporting season progressed, suggesting analysts had underestimated corporate resilience.
  • Across Asia, the tech-heavy sectors (Taiwan/Korea) led performance, along with North Asia exporters, while the still-sluggish Chinese domestic economy dragged elsewhere. Asian-domiciled companies issuing into the Australian Credit market are primarily the systemically-important banks across the region and their earnings were rock solid on this front.

Private debt problems continue to play out as we expected

The reason we wanted to feature private debt in our commentary this month is not only to raise awareness of the issues the asset class faces, but also to highlight that while some peers in the higher-income universe invest in private loans and structured credit to support their performance and volatility metrics, the Schroders High Yielding Credit Fund does not invest in these assets.

You’d have to be living under a rock to miss the recent developments in parts of the private credit market that have attracted significant media and regulatory attention. The collapse of Sydney-based developer, Bathla Group, has highlighted some of the risks associated with certain private credit exposures. The rapid growth of the asset class over the past decade, together with concerns regarding transparency, governance and risk management practices, has led to a number of issues that are now coming into sharper focus. Where such practices have taken hold, they highlight the risk of insufficient safeguards for retail investor capital.

In Q4 2025 ASIC produced a report highlighting concerns within the Australian private credit market, including poor disclosure and transparency, inappropriate marketing, fees, governance, valuation practices, liquidity and credit-risk management. Consequently, several stop orders were issued as well as a broader industry-wide call to action. Since then, a number of some funds have restricted redemptions or suspended distributions, further increasing investor focus on the sector.

Some Funds have suggested that withdrawal restrictions are intended to “protect” their existing investors. In our view, the most effective risk mitigation for investor capital occurs upfront – in the underwriting, credit research, valuation and pricing stages - not at the point when loan quality is rapidly deteriorating. In our view, these events may may prove to be an early sign rather than an isolated one and our concern from here on in, is the contagion effect across investor portfolios, particularly for those who have limited understanding of the risks that can sit within this part of the market.

Public credit, in contrast to Private credit, operates within a more transparent and regulated market structure, is highly regulated with independent daily market pricing, full transparency and daily liquidity and rather than being concentrated in property linked lending. back by questionable commercial real estate assets, we invest in high-quality corporates and infrastructure issuers like Melbourne Airport, Ausnet and APA. Furthermore, with base rate rises over the past 4 years, the delta between returns on private versus public credit have narrowed significantly, and we believe investors should carefully assess whether the incremental return available from private credit justifies the trade-offs in liquidity, quality and transparency.

Market Outlook

We aren't expecting a significant rally in spreads, given the continued pipeline of new issuance, including ElectraNet, Aurizon, ARTC, Lotteries Corporation, and potentially Amazon in September. Overall, we expect more of the same: spreads range-bound but delivering high-quality carry. Separately, over A$2 billion of Australian retail bank hybrids mature over the next two months. Investors with exposure should be reviewing reallocation now, as pricing on these securities reverts to par and liquidity is likely to deteriorate.

We flag this because our year-end conviction trade remains Australian major bank Tier 2, which has underperformed this month against the supersized Alphabet issuance. However, the hybrid investor base, outside of direct retail investors, is largely passive and coupled with active funds mandated to buy subordinated Australian major bank paper, is delivering a structural demand pool for Tier 2 securities. With little to no further Tier 2 issuance expected for the year, we anticipate this demand base absorbing the remaining available stock.

Portfolio update

With so many deals on offer, you might be thinking that we are spoilt for choice, however new issuance concessions on deals vary considerably and valuation discipline remains critical. At an index level, valuations have improved as over-supply this month shifted spreads wider. With talk of an Amazon deal in the pipeline, our expectation is that spreads will continue to underperform at least until we get a pause in supply and the market has a chance to absorb issuance.

One of our preferred sectors is utilities given the solid fundamentals, cash flow predictability and regulatory environment for these assets. However, with the NextEra deal coming with a generous new issuance premium, names like Transgrid have underperformed, which has unfortunately impacted our performance. That said, we have high conviction on the name and will consider adding to our position at the wider spread level. With no clear pipeline of higher yielding deals to follow, non-financial corporate subordinated paper looks well positioned to rally as NextEra’s issuance is absorbed.

The portfolio remains well diversified across 41 different Issuers and 79 individual securities. We continue to believe that with the enhanced level of geopolitical and market risk that is embedded in the system today, portfolios with concentrated positions in a small number of issuers are at risk of underperformance.

Learn more about investing in the Schroder Australian High Yielding Credit Fund or the Schroder Australian High Yielding Credit Fund - Active ETF.

This document is issued by Schroder Investment Management Australia Limited (ABN 22 000 443 274, AFSL 226473) (Schroders). It is intended solely for wholesale clients (as defined under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)) and is not suitable for distribution to retail clients. This document does not contain and should not be taken as containing any financial product advice or financial product recommendations. This document does not take into consideration any recipient’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Before making any decision relating to a Schroders fund, you should obtain and read a copy of the product disclosure statement available at www.schroders.com.au or other relevant disclosure document for that fund and consider the appropriateness of the fund to your objectives, financial situation and needs. You should also refer to the target market determination for the fund at www.schroders.com.au. All investments carry risk, and the repayment of capital and performance in any of the funds named in this document are not guaranteed by Schroders or any company in the Schroders Group. The material contained in this document is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice. Schroders does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information which is contained in this document. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Schroders, every company in the Schroders plc group, and their respective directors, officers, employees, consultants and agents exclude all liability (however arising) for any direct or indirect loss or damage that may be suffered by the recipient or any other person in connection with this document. Opinions, estimates and projections contained in this document reflect the opinions of the authors as at the date of this document and are subject to change without notice. “Forward-looking” information, such as forecasts or projections, are not guarantees of any future performance and there is no assurance that any forecast or projection will be realised. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. All references to securities, sectors, regions and/or countries are made for illustrative purposes only and are not to be construed as recommendations to buy, sell or hold. Telephone calls and other electronic communications with Schroders representatives may be recorded.

预览 PDF
1 / 110%

正在载入文档……

AI 分析
由 AI 依据上文研报生成 · 非原文直译、非机构原话 · 重要判断请核对官网原文
关键论点
  • 八月份创纪录的公司债发行,包括Alphabet的55亿澳元超大规模交易,导致市场消化不良和利差走阔。
  • 澳大利亚企业财报季总体尚可但多速并存,资源和数据中心相关公司表现积极,而非必需消费品公司态度谨慎。
  • 私募信贷问题不断升级,透明度和治理令人担忧;本基金避免此类资产。
  • 年底信心交易为澳大利亚主要银行二级资本债券,受结构性需求和有限供应的支撑。
  • 公用事业板块仍为首选,利差走阔时存在加仓机会。
风险
  • 由于持续供应(包括潜在的亚马逊交易),利差进一步走阔的风险。
  • 澳大利亚房地产市场快速恶化影响消费支出和信贷质量的风险。
  • 私募信贷问题蔓延影响更广泛投资者投资组合的风险。
  • 如果供应仍然沉重,澳大利亚主要银行二级资本债券表现落后的风险持续。
  • 零售银行混合资本债到期时流动性下降的风险。