视频:为何收益率上升及其对美元的影响(4分钟)
视频:更仔细审视台股的四个理由(5分钟)
视频:为何收益率上升及其对美元的影响(4分钟)
视频:更仔细审视台股的四个理由(5分钟)
近几周,美联储官员的言论日益偏鹰派。美联储主席凯文·沃什在杰克逊霍尔演讲中的核心信息直截了当:如果通胀未能以“令人满意的速度”继续改善,提高利率将成为最可能的政策回应。此外,他基本上淡化了近期通胀数据的缓和以及7月较为疲软的劳动力市场报告。受此影响,市场隐含的9月加息概率大幅上升。
即将公布的就业报告和消费者价格指数(CPI)报告将被视为检验这种转向更多政策收紧的立场是否适当以及是否可能持续的依据。市场共识预计,在7月就业人数下降23,000之后,8月美国就业增长(于4年9月公布)将反弹至约50,000。共识还预计,美国核心CPI通胀(于11年9月公布)环比上升0.2%,同比上升约2.5%。周四,州长沃勒发表了比之前更偏鸽派的言论,暗示月度核心个人消费支出(PCE)读数若为0.3%或更低,就足以让他建议下次会议维持利率不变。
我们的观点是什么?我们认为,美联储的决定处于微妙的平衡之中。在我们的基准情景下,我们投资展望的潜在驱动力——与人工智能相关的资本支出、广泛的盈利增长以及富有韧性的经济活动——仍然具有建设性。美国经济增长在2026,年约为2%,接近趋势水平,通胀从当前水平逐步缓解,使美联储有可能维持利率不变。
然而,从投资角度来看,我们认为关键问题不仅仅是美联储加息还是按兵不动,而是美联储行动的宏观背景。在通胀回落速度慢于预期但增长指标依然稳健的情况下加息,与在通胀持续且增长乏力的背景下加息,其影响是不同的。在我们最近的《House View》月刊《On the ball》中,我们概述了这两种可能性。
在一种情景下,即“人工智能腾飞”,美国经济在2026年和2027年都以高于趋势水平的速度增长,分别为2.5-3.0%,且通胀仍高于目标。在这种情景下,我们认为美联储将加息最多三次,因为联邦公开市场委员会(FOMC)上调了对生产率增长的估计。这将是一种相对具有建设性的加息形式,因为更强的人工智能相关投资和生产率预期支撑经济增长、就业和企业利润。
在第二种情景下,即美联储“政策考验”,面对通胀顽固而增长乏力,美联储可能加息两次。这将是一种不太有利的紧缩形式。如果通胀依然顽固而增长失去动力,更高的利率可能给消费者和企业带来压力。
展望即将公布的数据,8月就业报告中需求走强的证据——私营部门就业增长超过50,000,且失业率维持在4.1%或更低的水平——将代表朝着我们上行情景的方向发展。与此同时,通胀数据高于预期可能表明我们正走向更不利的情景,尤其是如果它伴随着疲弱的就业增长(例如,就业增长20,000或更低,同时失业率升至4.2%或更高)。
我们如何投资?在我们的月度信函中,我们提醒投资者注意沃什(Warsh)的箴言:“看球,别看裁判。”围绕美联储政策任何变化的市场波动可能为投资者提供一个践行这一理念的机会。投资者应审视其当前和目标的资产配置,并准备利用即将到来的数据点和美联储公告引发的市场波动,使配置更接近目标。
例如,这可能包括在股市潜在回调时买入(前提是企业盈利前景依然强劲),利用中长久期优质债券收益率走高获利,在美元走强时减少多余美元头寸,或利用金价回调构建长期投资组合对冲。
股票 对于股票,我们认为关键问题不在于美联储是否加息,而在于加息所处的宏观背景。
在增长更强劲、人工智能投资活跃、就业和利润增长强劲的背景下收紧政策,即使市场可能经历短期波动,也可能与风险资产持续获得支撑的背景相符。我们继续布局股市上行,并继续看好人工智能、电力和资源以及长寿经济,这些板块都应受益于更强劲的投资、生产力提升和结构性增长。与此同时,我们仍警惕在通胀黏性和增长疲软的背景下收紧政策可能带来的逆风。
债券 近期美联储利率预期上升导致债券收益率走高,同时与人工智能相关的债券发行量增加以及美国债务可负担性担忧推高了风险溢价。
如果美联储走上加息路径,短期债券相对于现金的优势可能会缩小。投资者仍可从短期债券中获得有吸引力的收益,但资本利得的可能性将更有限,政策路径进一步向上重新定价可能拖累回报。因此,我们将不再建议投资者将锁定中短期债券收益率作为现金的替代选择。
与此同时,我们认为,鉴于近期收益率走高,收益率曲线中长端可能正在打开有吸引力的投资组合多元化机会。如果美联储收紧政策增强了市场对央行通胀承诺的信心、降低了长期通胀预期或减缓了增长,这一市场部分最终可能受益。因此,中长久期优质债券可能既提供有吸引力的收益,又能在任何不利增长结果下提供有用的投资组合多元化。然而,鉴于期限溢价、政府融资需求和通胀方面持续存在不确定性,应审慎评估入场点。例如,短期利率在更长时间内维持高位可能加剧美国债务可负担性担忧,因为美国已大幅缩短其融资期限结构。
对新兴市场债券和高收益债券的影响也将取决于美联储加息所处的宏观背景。如果伴随增长更为强劲,信用利差可能维持压缩;但如果美联储加息是对更为负面的通胀和增长组合的回应,则可能引发利差扩大。当前指数层面的收益率水平为投资者提供了相当大的缓冲以抵御负总回报,尽管精选标的仍然至关重要,因为发行人特定风险可能导致表现分化。
美元 更偏鹰派的美联储最初可能会支撑美元,尤其是在与其他央行的政策分化扩大且美国经济增长相对强劲的情况下。同样,这种支撑的性质可能取决于加息背后的背景。在强劲增长背景下的紧缩政策可能通过更强的资本流动和相对经济表现,使美元走强持续更长时间。相比之下,在增长疲软背景下由通胀驱动的紧缩政策,前景将更加复杂,因为收益率上升可能开始与对财政可持续性和长期经济前景的担忧相竞争。
黄金 更高的实际利率和更强劲的美元可能对黄金构成近期阻力。但如果美联储主要应对的是持续通胀、地缘政治不确定性或对财政和货币信誉的担忧,这种影响可能会被抵消。因此,我们将继续将黄金主要视为投资组合对冲和多元化工具,而非针对美联储下一次决策的战术性表达。
更广泛地说,大宗商品有可能在能源中断或通胀再度抬头对股票和债券构成挑战的情形下,提供结构性回报来源和多元化。电气化、电力需求上升、人工智能基础设施投资以及供应受限,都支持该类资产的长期前景。
Video: Why yields are rising and what it means for the dollar (4 mins)Video: Four reasons to take a closer look at Taiwanese equities (5 mins)
Rhetoric from Federal Reserve officials has become increasingly hawkish in recent weeks. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's central message from his Jackson Hole speech was straightforward: If inflation does not continue to improve at a “satisfactory speed,” higher interest rates would become the most likely policy response. In addition, he largely dismissed the recent moderation in inflation data and the softer July labor market report. In response, the market-implied odds of a September hike rose sharply.
The upcoming payroll and consumer price index (CPI) reports will be viewed as tests of whether this shift in stance toward more policy tightening is appropriate, and likely to continue. Consensus expects US payroll growth (released 4 September) to rebound to around 50,000 in August, after employment fell by 23,000 in July. Consensus is for US core CPI inflation (11 September) to increase 0.2% month on month and around 2.5% year over year. On Thursday, in more dovish comments than previously, Governor Waller implied that a monthly core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) reading of 0.3% or less would be sufficient for him to recommend rates to stay unchanged at the next meeting.
What is our view? In our view, the Fed's decision is finely balanced. In our base case, the underlying drivers of our investment outlook—AI-related capital spending, broad earnings growth, and resilient economic activity—remain constructive. US growth expands at around 2% in 2026, close to trend, and inflation eases gradually from current levels, enabling the Fed to potentially keep rates on hold.
Yet from an investment perspective, we think the key question is not simply whether the Fed hikes or holds, but the backdrop against which the Fed acts. A rate hike accompanied by slower-than-desired progress on disinflation while growth indicators remain solid has different implications versus a hike accompanied by persistent inflation alongside muted growth. In our recent House View monthly publication, “On the ball,” we outlined both possibilities.
In one scenario, "AI liftoff,” the US economy grows at an above trend rate of 2.5-3.0% in both 2026 and 2027 and inflation stays above target. In this scenario, we believe the Fed would hike interest rates up to three times, as the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) revises its estimate of productivity growth higher. This would be a comparatively constructive form of interest rates hikes, as stronger AI-related investment and productivity expectations support economic growth, employment, and corporate profits.
In a second scenario, a Fed “policy test,” the Fed could hike interest rates twice in response to inflation proving sticky while growth is muted. This would be a less favorable form of tightening. If inflation remains sticky while growth loses momentum, higher rates could pressure consumers and companies.
Looking ahead to the data releases, evidence of stronger demand in the labor report for August—private jobs growth of over 50,000 and an unemployment rate staying around 4.1% or lower—would represent a move in the direction of our upside scenario. Meanwhile, hotter-than-expected inflation data could be an indicator that we are heading toward the more adverse scenario, particularly if it comes alongside weak payrolls growth (for example, jobs growth of 20,000 or less, alongside a rise in the unemployment rate to 4.2% or more).
How do we invest? In our Monthly Letter, we reminded investors of Warsh’s mantra to “watch the ball, not the referee.” Market volatility surrounding any change in Fed policy could provide investors an opportunity to put that into action. Investors should review their current and target asset allocation, and prepare to use market moves around upcoming data points and the Fed announcement to bring allocations closer to target.
This could include, for example, buying potential dips in equities (provided earnings prospects remain strong), taking advantage of elevated medium-to-long duration quality bond yields, reducing excess dollar holdings on strength, or using dips in gold to build a longer-term portfolio hedge.
Equities For equities, we believe the key issue will not be whether the Fed hikes, but against which backdrop.
Tightening accompanied by stronger growth, AI investment, employment, and profits would likely be consistent with a continued supportive backdrop for risk assets, even if markets might experience some short-term choppiness. We continue to position for the upside in equities and continue to favor AI, power and resources, and longevity, all of which should benefit from stronger investment, productivity gains, and structural growth. Meanwhile, we remain watchful for the potential headwinds from tightening against a backdrop of sticky inflation and weaker growth.
Bonds Higher Fed rate expectations have contributed to higher bond yields in recent days, alongside elevated AI-related debt issuance and US debt affordability concerns, which have increased risk premiums.
If the Fed moves onto a hiking path, the relative advantage of short-duration bonds over cash would likely narrow. Investors could still earn attractive income in short-duration bonds, but the potential for capital gains would be more limited and further upward repricing of the policy path could weigh on returns. As such, we would no longer recommend that investors lock in yields in short- to medium-duration bonds as an alternative to cash.
At the same time, we believe attractive portfolio diversification opportunities could be opening up in the medium to long part of the yield curve, given the recent moves higher in yields. This part of the market may ultimately benefit if Fed tightening reinforces confidence in the central bank’s inflation commitment, reduces longer-term inflation expectations, or slows growth. Medium- to long-maturity high-quality bonds could therefore offer both attractive income and useful portfolio diversification against any adverse growth outcome. Entry points should nevertheless be assessed carefully, given continued uncertainty around term premiums, government financing needs, and inflation. For example, higher-for-longer short-end rates could worsen US debt affordability concerns, as the US has aggressively shortened its funding profile.
The impact on emerging market bonds and high yield would also depend on the backdrop against which the Fed is hiking. If it is accompanied by stronger growth, then credit spreads are likely to remain compressed, but if the Fed hikes in response to a more negative inflation and growth mix, it could likely prompt some spread widening. Current yields on an index level provide investors with a sizable cushion against negative total returns, although selectivity remains key, as issuer-specific risks might drive divergences in performance.
US dollar A more hawkish Fed would likely initially support the US dollar, particularly if policy divergence with other central banks widens and US growth remains comparatively strong. Again, the nature of that support would likely depend on the backdrop behind the hikes. Tightening amid strong growth could sustain the dollar for longer through stronger capital flows and relative economic performance. In contrast, inflation-led tightening alongside weaker growth would present a more mixed outlook, as higher yields may start to compete with concerns about fiscal sustainability and the longer-term economic outlook.
Gold Higher real interest rates and a stronger dollar could create near-term headwinds for gold. But the effect may be offset if the Fed is responding primarily to persistent inflation, geopolitical uncertainty, or concerns about fiscal and monetary credibility. We would therefore continue to view gold primarily as a portfolio hedge and diversifier, rather than as a tactical expression of the next Fed decision.
More broadly, commodities can potentially provide both a structural source of return and diversification in scenarios where energy disruption or renewed inflation challenges equities and bonds. Electrification, rising power demand, AI infrastructure investment, and constrained supply support the longer-term outlook for the asset class.
正在载入文档……