荷兰已将部分黄金储备从北美转移至伦敦。它并未增持黄金,而是将更多现有黄金储备置于离全球流动性最强的黄金市场更近的地方,以便在危机中能更快交易。荷兰央行已从纽约和渥太华转移了约 86 吨黄金至伦敦。该行表示,此举旨在提升其危机应对能力。伦敦在荷兰黄金储备中的占比已从 18.1% 升至 32.1%。纽约和渥太华的份额均已降至 18.5%。另有略低于 31% 的黄金仍留在荷兰国内。该国总黄金储备保持不变,仍为 612.4 吨。变化的只是其存放地点和可交易性。
央行黄金存放地点为何重要
央行持续增持黄金
此次转移是在央行多年强劲购金之后进行的。在 2022 至 2024 年间,央行每年增持黄金超过 1,000 吨。 2025 年购买量放缓至约 863 吨,但仍处于历史高位。需求不太可能消失。在世界黄金协会的最新调查中, 89% 的储备经理预计未来 12 个月全球央行黄金持有量将增加。创纪录的 45% 的储备经理预计其所在机构将增持黄金。随着官方持有量增长,央行需要更审慎地思考如何管理这些储备。黄金可能在危机时期提供保护,但若危机来临,黄金也必须易于获取。
伦敦使黄金更易于交易
伦敦是全球最大的实物黄金场外交易市场,而英格兰银行是全球最大的黄金托管机构之一。其金库存有约 400,000 根金条,重约 5,000 吨,仅少于纽约联邦储备银行。这些黄金属于外国央行、国际组织和英国政府。存储在伦敦的黄金可在不离开金库的情况下实现所有权变更,前提是交易双方均在英格兰银行开设账户,从而降低搬运金条的成本和风险。这些黄金以分配方式持有,客户保留特定金条的所有权。英格兰银行仅接受符合伦敦良好交割标准的金条,这使得金条在市场压力时期更易于出售或兑换外币。
荷兰央行通过两种途径转移黄金
荷兰央行在纽约出售了约 59 吨黄金,并在伦敦购买了等量黄金。同时还从北美实际运送了超过 27 吨黄金至荷兰。随后,类似数量的国际可交易黄金从荷兰转移至伦敦。这样,荷兰央行无需将全部 86 吨黄金横跨大西洋运输,而是结合了黄金出售和实物转移两种方式。对荷兰央行而言,此次操作也是一次有益的演练。该央行现在拥有了通过市场置换黄金和实物转移金条两种经验。若危机时期其中一种途径不可用,这些经验可能派上用场。
荷兰央行重新分布黄金储备
搬迁前后占总储备的比例
流动性增强并未消除风险
存放在英格兰银行的黄金仍归外国央行所有,但其实体位于英国,因此受英国司法管辖。
对于荷兰而言,其在伦敦的黄金面临无法取回的风险微乎其微。但委内瑞拉的经历表明,海外托管可能演变为政治问题。
委内瑞拉近期再次提出要求,希望取回存放在英格兰银行的价值约$4亿美元的黄金,以资助2026地震后的重建工作。自2018年以来,由于对哪个机构有权代表其中央银行存在争议,该国一直无法动用这些黄金。这一案例虽属特例,但表明东道国的法院和政治承认决定可能影响对储备的获取。
将大量黄金运回国内也可能耗时良久。这需要安全的运输、保险和适当的储存设施。国内存储使国家拥有更直接的控制权,但也可能使黄金更难以快速出售或互换。
各央行正采取不同的路径
法国已将存放在美国的黄金运回巴黎,而塞尔维亚计划将黄金留在国内。荷兰则选择了不同的路线。尽管该国在2014,年遣返了部分黄金,但如今为了提高进入市场的速度,正在增加存放在伦敦的黄金份额。
世界黄金协会的调查显示,未来还计划有进一步变动。在未来12个月内,7%的受访者打算增加国内存储,而9%计划分散其海外存储地点。
英格兰银行仍是海外金库中使用最广泛的存储地点。
更多央行正在重新考虑黄金的存储地点
未来12个月内计划对托管安排进行的调整
价格影响有限,但信号明确
这一变动本身对黄金价格应无太大直接影响。荷兰的储备并未增加;在纽约的卖出在很大程度上被在伦敦的买入所抵消。但这强化了黄金在央行危机规划中的作用。
荷兰央行并未购买更多保险,而是确保其已拥有的保险能够在需要时发挥作用。
完整英文原文
The Netherlands has moved part of its gold reserves from North America to London. It has not bought more bullion. Instead, it has put more of its existing holdings closer to the world’s most liquid gold market, where they can be traded more quickly in a crisis
The Dutch central bank has moved around 86 tonnes of gold from New York and Ottawa to London. The aim, the bank said, is to improve its crisis preparedness.
London’s share of Dutch gold reserves has risen from 18.1% to 32.1%. The shares held in New York and Ottawa have fallen to 18.5% each. Just under 31% remains in the Netherlands.
The country’s total gold reserves remain unchanged at 612.4 tonnes. Only their location and tradability have changed.
Central banks keep buying gold
The move comes after several years of strong central bank gold buying. Central banks added more than 1,000 tonnes a year between 2022 and 2024. Purchases slowed to around 863 tonnes in 2025 but remained historically high.
Demand is unlikely to disappear. In the World Gold Council’s latest survey, 89% of reserve managers expected global central bank gold holdings to increase over the following 12 months. A record 45% expected their own institution to buy more.
As official holdings grow, central banks need to think more carefully about how those reserves are managed. Gold may provide protection during a crisis. But it must also be accessible if that crisis arrives.
London makes gold easier to trade
London is the world’s largest over-the-counter market for physical gold, and the Bank of England is one of the world’s largest gold custodians. Its vaults hold around 400,000 bars, or roughly 5,000 tonnes. Only the Federal Reserve Bank of New York holds more.
The gold belongs to foreign central banks, international organisations, and the UK government.
Gold stored there can change ownership without leaving the vault, provided both parties hold accounts at the Bank. This cuts the cost and risk of moving bullion.
The gold is held on an allocated basis, so customers retain ownership of specific bars. The Bank also accepts only bars that meet London Good Delivery standards; this makes them easier to sell or swap for foreign currency during periods of market stress.
DNB used two routes to move its gold
The Dutch central bank sold around 59 tonnes in New York and bought an equivalent amount in London. It also physically moved more than 27 tonnes from North America to the Netherlands. A similar amount of internationally tradable gold was then transferred from the Netherlands to London.
This meant the DNB did not have to transport the full 86 tonnes across the Atlantic, instead using a mix of gold sales and physical transfers.
For the DNB, the operation was also a useful dry run. The central bank now has experience of both replacing gold through the market and moving physical bars. That could prove useful if one route became unavailable during a crisis.
The Netherland redistributes its gold reserves
Share of total reserves before and after the relocation
Greater liquidity does not remove risk
Gold held at the Bank of England remains the property of the foreign central bank, but it is physically located in the UK and is therefore subject to UK jurisdiction.
For the Netherlands, the risk of losing access to its gold in London is remote. But the experience of Venezuela shows how foreign custody can become political.
Venezuela recently renewed its request for the return of around $4 billion of gold held at the Bank of England to help fund reconstruction after the 2026 earthquake. It has been unable to access the bullion since 2018 because of a dispute over which authority can represent its central bank. This case is exceptional – but it shows that the host country’s courts and political recognition decisions can affect access to reserves.
Bringing large amounts of gold home can also take time. It requires secure transport, insurance and suitable storage facilities. Domestic storage gives a country more direct control. It can, however, also make gold harder to sell or swap quickly.
Central banks are taking different paths
France has brought US-held gold back to Paris, while Serbia plans to keep its bullion domestically. The Netherlands has taken a different route. Although it repatriated some gold in 2014, it is now increasing the share held in London to gain quicker access to the market.
The World Gold Council survey suggests that further changes are planned. Over the next 12 months, 7% of respondents intend to increase domestic storage, while 9% plan to diversify their overseas storage locations.
The Bank of England remains the most widely used storage location outside domestic vaults.
More central banks are reconsidering where they store gold
Planned changes to custody arrangements over the next 12 months
Limited price impact, but a clear signal
The move itself should have little direct impact on gold prices. Dutch reserves have not increased; selling in New York was largely offset by buying in London. But it reinforces gold's role in central banks' crisis planning.
The DNB is not buying more insurance. It is making sure the insurance it already owns can be used.
预览 PDF
正在载入文档……
关键论点
- 尽管2025年购金速度放缓,央行黄金需求仍处于历史高位。
- 管理黄金储备需要兼顾可获取性与控制权。
- 英国央行金库提供流动性和可交易性优势,无需实物转移。
- 委内瑞拉案例凸显了外国托管的政治风险。
- 此次迁移增强了荷兰央行的危机应对能力。
风险
- 外国托管黄金的政治风险,如委内瑞拉案例所示。
- 遣返过程耗时,需安全运输和保险。
- 国内存储可能降低流动性和可交易性。