如果音乐现在就停止,对于许多发行人来说,长期收益率的绝对水平看起来相当合理。问题是音乐仍在轰鸣。很多事情正在发生,而且大部分压力仍指向长期利率上行。这不一定是一场戏剧,但如果被推得太远,也可能演变成一场戏剧。
利率:全球债券市场处于临界点
日本:30年期收益率从零到英雄
这里的突出表现之一是日本30年期收益率,已触及2.4%。这是政策利率(目前为0.25%)的四倍。这两者之间显然存在紧张关系。其根源是正常化通胀动态的演变。日本央行(BoJ)在这方面有所不足,因此长期收益率不得不过度反应。而日本央行的紧张关系也反映在日元大幅贬值上。以至于促使美日联合干预,以平息不稳定。但根本原因在于日本央行的缓慢行动。如果这种情况不改变,压力将持续存在。
美国:10年期收益率上4.8%所暗示的交叉点
我们在此评论过这与美国国债的联系。基本上,如果日元需要足够激进的美元抛售来对冲,则存在抛售美国国债的风险。而这是美国财政部现在最不想看到的。尤其是在财政部长斯科特·贝森特通过加倍长期回购表明,当国债收益率升至高位时存在一定程度的不适。这里的根本问题是财政赤字规模,除非这个问题得到妥善解决,否则国债收益率的压力将持续存在。美国30年期收益率目前为4.75%,未来向5.25%迈进的可能性很大。
值得关注的关键区域是美国10年期收益率上的4.8%。突破该水平可能会遭到美国财政部的抵制。如果10年期收益率确实突破,请记住,4.8%并不特别高。我们在2023年触及该水平,而10年期收益率的长期公允中性价值在3.5%左右(见此处)。在'4.8%'时,我们高于该水平。但考虑到通胀(3%)和财政赤字(占GDP的6%)的现状,我们可能理应如此。
这里有几件事正在发生。首先,我们不应忘记,疫情使发达市场受到通胀冲击,导致利率从异常低位回归正常的趋势。其次,疫情导致发达市场政府债务大量累积,使本已不稳定的债务动态变得更加棘手。美国就是一个明显的例子。
欧元区:夹在逆风中
与此同时,美国的财政压力,加上不断变化的政治动态,为欧洲各国政府注入了更大的国防需求,进而又增加了未来的财政支出要求。各种能源冲击也加剧了欧洲的通胀压力。再加上远更令人担忧的同期通胀动态,正迫使欧元区收益率上行。
在短端,欧洲央行已加息且还将继续加息。在长端,需要进行相对价值重新定价,以使欧元区长期收益率相对于其他替代品处于合适水平。例如,今年3月,日本30年期收益率升至德国30年期收益率之上,此后该利差已扩大至40bp区域。这是一种同时出现的相对价值压力。
再加上英国30年期国债收益率略低于6%,存在一种自我实现的阻力最小上行路径,我们仍需对此保持关注。
人工智能:生产率繁荣
当前的问题在于,没有实质性的抵消力量来抵御这些走势。而且,它们主要是由更高的实际收益率驱动的。更高的实际收益率更难逆转,除非或直到我们达到一个水平,对高收益率的需求开始出现。
美联储主席凯文·沃什在G20财长会议开幕时提到,即将讨论他所描述的未来的长期增长阶段。这无疑是指当前惊人的人工智能支出可能带来的生产率革命,而这项支出本身正在对宏观总体支出做出实质性贡献。这与更高的实际收益率相关,正如该领域久期较长的发行压力一样。
鉴于此,很难看到长端收益率上行压力会神奇地消散。即使在一段时间内消散,伊朗战争和能源价格压力也为保持其高位提供了额外借口。这对欧洲、亚洲乃至更远地区来说尤其是一个现实问题。鉴于这些因素的汇聚,财政部长贝森特可能要通过增加长期国债回购(从9年9月开始)来缓解压力,这可能需要付出巨大努力。风险在于,在情况结构性平静之前,我们可能不得不忍受一次过度调整,因为当前实际收益率的上行压力仍然强烈。
ING月度:经受冲击
- 此捆绑包含15篇文章
完整英文原文
If the music stopped now, the absolute level of long-end yields for many issuers looks reasonably fair. The problem is the music is still blaring. A lot is going on, and most of the pressure continues to point upwards for long rates. That does not have to be a drama, but then again, it could become one should it get pushed too far
It can take a lot to awaken long-end yields, but when they get prompted into action, they can be quite flighty. We've seen various episodes of this in recent years for idiosyncratic reasons. Think UK gilts and French OATS and respective political post-pandemic wobbles, or the perception of joint liability attached to Italian BTPs and concern there pre-pandemic. The past number of months have been different, as we've seen a synchronised rot attach to long ends, in particular across many (or most) developed markets.
Japan: From zero to hero on the 30yr yield
One of the standouts here is the Japanese 30yr yield, which has touched 4.2%. That's four times the policy rate (currently 1%). There is clearly a tension between these two. The genesis of that is the evolution of a normalised inflation dynamic. The Bank of Japan (BoJ) has undershot versus this, so the long end has had to overreact. And that BoJ tension is also reflected in severe weakness attached to the Japanese yen. So much so that it prompted joint intervention between the US and Japan, in an effort to calm instability. But the root cause here is a slow BoJ. If that does not change, the pressure will remain.
US: The cross-over point that 5% on the 10yr suggests
We've opined on the link between this and US Treasuries here. Essentially, if the yen required aggressive enough offsetting selling of US dollars, it risks a sell US Treasuries narrative. And that's the last thing the US Treasury wants to see right now. Especially as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has made it known through a doubling of long-end buybacks that there is a degree of discomfort when Treasury yields hit elevated levels. The root problem here is the size of the fiscal deficit, and until that is properly addressed, the pressure attached to Treasury yields is set to remain. The US 10yr yield is now at 4.8%, with progress toward 5% quite probable ahead.
A key area to watch is 5% on the US 10yr yield. Breaks above that would likely be resisted by the US Treasury. If the 10yr yield does break above, remember that 5% is not particularly high. We hit that level back in 2023, and the long-run fair neutral value for the 10yr yield is in the area of 4.5% (see here). At '5%', we're above that. But we arguably should be, given where inflation (3.5%) and the fiscal deficit (6% of GDP) are printing.
A few things are going on here. First, we should not forget that the pandemic shocked developed markets into inflation generation, resulting in a logical tendency for interest rates to return toward normal (from being abnormally low). Second, the pandemic generated a material build in developed market government debt, and took already rocky debt dynamics to a more troubling place. The US is a clear case in point here.
Eurozone: Caught between cross-winds
Meanwhile, the US fiscal pressure, together with a changing political dynamic, has injected an increased defence need for European governments, in turn adding to fiscal spending requirements in the future. And various energy shocks have added to European inflation pressure. That, together with a far more troubling contemporaneous inflation dynamic, is forcing eurozone yields to the upside.
On the front end, the European Central Bank has hiked and is set to do more. On the back end, there is a relative value re-pricing required so that eurozone long-end rates sit appropriately versus alternatives. For example, in March this year, the 30yr Japanese yield moved above the 30yr German yield, and that spread has since widened to the 40bp area. That's a simultaneous relative value pressure.
Throw in the 30yr UK gilt yield at just short of 6% and there is a self-fulfilling path of least resistance higher that we need to remain concerned with.
AI: The productivity boom
The issue right now is that there is no material countervailing force to resist these moves. Also, they are being driven predominantly by higher real rates. Higher real rates are tougher to reverse, until or unless we get to a level where demand for elevated yields begins to kick in.
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh at the opening of the G20 finance meeting spoke of an upcoming discussion on what he described as a secular growth phase ahead. This is no doubt in reference to the productivity revolution that could come from the astonishing AI spend currently ongoing, which in itself is making a material contribution to macro-wide spending. That correlates with higher real yields, as does duration-heavy issuance pressure in this space.
Given this, it's tough to see the pressure for higher long-end yields magically dissipate. And even when it does for a period, the Iran war and energy price pressure provide an additional excuse to keep them elevated. This is especially a live problem for Europe to deal with, and for Asia, and indeed beyond. Given this weight of confluences, Treasury Secretary Bessent may well have his work cut out to ease the pressure through increased Treasury long-end buybacks (these start on 9 September). The risk is we may have to endure an overshoot before things structurally calm, as the current upside pressure on real rates remains intense.
ING Monthly: Weathering the shocks
- This bundle contains 15 Articles
预览 PDF
正在载入文档……
关键论点
- 由于财政赤字、能源冲击和AI支出,长端收益率面临上行压力。
- 日本央行政策正常化缓慢,推高长端收益率,影响日元并可能波及美国国债。
- 美国10年期收益率在4.8%,料将测试5%,财政部回购将于9月9日开始。
- 欧元区长端收益率因财政需求和通胀而上升,需与日本进行相对价值重估。
- 英国30年期国债收益率接近6%,表明上行路径自我强化。
- 没有反作用力;实际利率上升难以逆转,存在超调风险。
风险
- 如果长端收益率被推得太高,超调可能演变成危机。
- 日本央行行动缓慢可能使日元疲软,引发干预并给美国国债带来压力。
- 财政赤字未得到解决,收益率的上行压力持续存在。
- 实际利率上升难以逆转,可能导致市场动荡。
- 能源冲击和伊朗战争可能加剧通胀和收益率压力。