II 全球机构情报
盛宝银行 · 2026/09/03

紧张的大宗商品市场为何提升投资者回报

前往官网原文 ↗
完整研报正文
完整中文译文

紧张的大宗商品市场为何提升投资者回报

要点:

  • 大宗商品正受益于两个回报来源:过去一年,彭博大宗商品总回报指数上涨了 43.3%,而现货指数上涨了 35%,凸显了正展期收益的额外贡献。
  • 能源板块提供最强的展期收益:紧张的现货市场推动布伦特、WTI和成品油期货进入深度现货升水,多种燃料合约的一年期隐含展期收益率超过 20%。
  • 现货升水可以强化看涨市场条件:当供应紧张时,投资者可以从更高的现货价格和正展期收益中受益,这有助于解释为何处于现货升水的大宗商品市场往往在价格回调时吸引买盘。
  • 曲线结构的方向与走势同样重要:期货升水则产生相反的动态,负展期收益随时间侵蚀回报,即使标的商品价格前景向好,也提高了投资者的回报门槛。

大宗商品涨势背后的隐性顺风

今年大宗商品的强劲表现不仅仅由现货价格上涨驱动。紧张的现货市场,尤其是能源板块,推动期货曲线进一步陷入现货升水,通过正展期收益为投资者提供了额外的回报来源。过去一年,彭博大宗商品总回报指数上涨了 43.3%,而彭博大宗商品现货指数上涨了 35%。今年以来,两个指数分别上涨了 33.4% 和 26.5%。

过去五年,现货指数上涨了 25.5%,而总回报指数上涨了 71.6%。相比之下,在此前的五年期间(从 2016 到 2021,),现货指数回报率为 65.2%,而总回报指数下跌了 3.5%。这一时期的特征是供应充足,而新冠疫情期间需求的短期骤降进一步加剧了这一状况。

这些数据凸显了市场条件——特别是供应是紧张还是充足——如何显著影响投资者回报。请注意,过往表现并不预示未来结果。

这一差距反映了期货曲线结构。BCOM等大宗商品指数通过定期展期至较远月合约的期货合约获得敞口。当近月合约价格高于远月合约时,通过以高于所购次月合约的价格卖出到期合约,展期可以产生正回报。在期货升水状态下,则情况相反。

能源板块提供最强劲的顺风

这一效应在能源板块最为显著,过去六个月中,一年期隐含滚动收益率大幅上升,布伦特原油和WTI原油目前提供的正利差分别约为19%和21%。成品油的表现更为强劲,柴油、ULSD(柴油)和RBOB汽油的隐含滚动收益率均高于20%,有些甚至接近30%。

今年以来,这些条件帮助BCOM能源指数(该指数包括天然气,年初至今下跌20%)实现了75.8%的总实际回报,而同期现货指数仅上涨了51.3%。

陡峭的期货贴水反映了实物能源市场的紧张态势。中东和俄罗斯供应及运输的中断、成品油库存偏低以及异常强劲的炼油利润率,使得近期供应相对于远期合约的溢价上升。

这为投资者创造了一个强大的组合:多头头寸既能受益于现货价格上涨,也能在滚动持仓时获得正利差。

为什么期货贴水能鼓励逢低买入

陡峭的期货贴水曲线通常表明,消费者愿意为立即交割支付溢价,这反映出库存偏低、供应不确定性或近期需求强劲。

只要供应紧张状况持续,时间就会通过正利差对多头头寸有利。因此,如果实物市场依然紧张且曲线保持贴水,那么由宏观经济因素、获利了结或风险情绪改善引起的回调,可能被视为买入机会。

期货升水则产生相反的动态。投资者滚动多头头寸时必须不断转向更昂贵的合约,负利差会侵蚀回报,除非现货价格上涨到足以弥补。

因此,曲线结构可以在基本面和技术面展望之外,提供重要的确认信息或警示信号。

金属板块在结构上仍然不同

并非所有大宗商品板块目前都能提供正利差,贵金属和工业金属大多处于期货升水状态,但锌是一个显著的例外。这并不自动意味着基本面疲软。金属通常在期货升水状态下交易,因为远期价格包含了融资、仓储和其他持有成本。由于美元融资成本仍然居高不下,12个月期利率约为4.2%,黄金、白银和几种工业金属面临更高的进入期货贴水状态的门槛。

因此,锌的正滚动收益率尤其值得注意,这反映出支撑该金属的供应端紧张状况。相比之下,尽管铜价接近创纪录水平,铜仍处于温和的期货升水状态,这说明曲线结构在不同板块必须区别解读。

农产品板块则呈现复杂局面,部分市场正走向更强的期货贴水,而其他市场仍处于期货升水状态,具体取决于库存、收成和天气预期以及即期供应情况。

滚动收益已成为大宗商品投资故事的重要组成部分

仅关注现货价格表现的投资者可能会忽视大宗商品回报中一个日益重要的组成部分。

BCOM总回报与现货表现之间的历史差异表明,展期期货敞口带来了可观的贡献。BCOM总滚动收益——以总回报指数与现货指数之间的12个月回报差衡量——已升至约8.8个百分点,接近五年来的最强水平。然而,如图所示,这一回报完全由能源领域的强势所驱动,这预示着一旦能源供应形势正常化,滚动收益可能会降低。与此同时,由战争和天气引发的关键农产品市场趋紧的初步迹象尚未转化为显著的期货贴水,这与俄罗斯对乌克兰战争爆发后的2022至2024期间所见情况不同。

当前期货曲线仍显示出正面的总体滚动收益,尽管速度较过去一年实现的异常贡献有所缓和。基于目前的BCOM目标权重及其25个成分商品的一年期隐含滚动收益,加权隐含滚动收益约为3.3%。

这一区别至关重要:8.8个百分点描述了过去一年经历的有利曲线条件,而3.3%则是对当前隐含滚动收益的瞬时快照,并非对未来已实现回报的预测。

总体而言,大宗商品市场正受到供应约束、现货价格上涨以及期货曲线结构持续利好多头敞口的支撑。只要实物紧俏持续——尤其是能源领域——期货贴水便提供额外的顺风,支持在回调时买入而非自动将其视为更大范围逆转的开始。

相反,若这些曲线显著趋平或重新转向期货升水,则预示着实物紧俏正在缓解。因此,关注曲线形态可能与关注价格本身几乎同等重要。

  • 盛宝银行 Ole Hansen 的文章
  • 本文提供市场评论和见解,而非交易建议——欢迎关注我的 Twitter 和 Substack,参与讨论
完整英文原文

Key Points:

  • Commodities are benefiting from two sources of return: The Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index has gained 43.3% over the past year, compared with 35% for the Spot Index, highlighting the additional contribution from positive roll returns.
  • Energy is providing the strongest carry: Tight physical markets have driven Brent, WTI and refined products into steep backwardation, with one-year implied roll yields above 20% across several fuel contracts.
  • Backwardation can reinforce bullish market conditions: When supply is tight, investors can benefit from both higher spot prices and positive carry, helping explain why commodity markets in backwardation often attract buying on price corrections.
  • Curve structure matters as much as direction: Contango creates the opposite dynamic, with negative carry eroding returns over time and raising the hurdle for investors even when the underlying commodity price outlook is constructive.

The hidden tailwind behind the commodity rally

The strong performance of commodities this year has been driven by more than rising spot prices. Tight physical markets, particularly across energy, have pushed futures curves deeper into backwardation, providing investors with an additional source of return through positive carry. Over the past year, the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index has risen 43.3%, compared with a 35% gain in the Bloomberg Commodity Spot Index. Year to date, the indexes are up 33.4% and 26.5%, respectively.

Over the past five years, the Spot Index has gained 25.5%, while the Total Return Index has risen 71.6%. By contrast, during the previous five-year period, from 2016 to 2021, the Spot Index returned 65.2%, while the Total Return Index fell 3.5%. This period was characterized by ample supply, further reinforced by the sharp, short-term drop in demand during the Covid pandemic.

These figures highlight how market conditions - particularly whether supply is tight or abundant - can significantly affect investor returns. Please note that past performance is not indicative of future results.

The gap reflects futures-curve structure. Commodity indices such as BCOM gain exposure through futures contracts that are periodically rolled into later maturities. When nearby contracts trade above deferred contracts, the roll can generate a positive return by selling an expiring contract at a higher price than the next contract being bought. In contango, the opposite applies.

Energy delivers the strongest tailwind

The effect is most pronounced across energy, where the one-year implied roll yield has risen sharply during the past six months, with Brent and WTI currently offering positive carry of around 19% and 21%, respectively. Refined products are even stronger, with gasoil, ULSD (diesel) and RBOB gasoline showing implied roll yields above 20% and, in some cases, close to 30%.

So far this year, these conditions have helped the BCOM Energy Index - which includes natural gas, down 20% year to date - deliver a total realised return of 75.8%, while the underlying spot index has gained “only” 51.3%.

The steep backwardation reflects tight physical energy markets. Disruption to Middle East and Russian supply and shipping, low product inventories and exceptionally strong refinery margins have increased the premium for prompt supply relative to barrels available further into the future.

This creates a powerful combination for investors: a long position can benefit from both rising spot prices and positive carry as exposure is rolled along the curve.

Why backwardation can encourage buying on weakness

A steeply backwardated curve generally signals that consumers are willing to pay a premium for immediate delivery, reflecting low inventories, supply uncertainty or strong near-term demand.

Provided that tightness persists, time works in favour of long positions through positive carry. A correction caused by macroeconomic factors, profit-taking or improved risk sentiment may therefore be viewed as a buying opportunity if the physical market remains tight and the curve stays backwardated.

Contango creates the opposite dynamic. Investors rolling long positions must repeatedly move into more expensive contracts, allowing negative carry to erode returns unless spot prices rise enough to compensate.

Curve structure can therefore provide important confirmation - or a warning - alongside the fundamental and technical outlook.

Metals remain structurally different

Not all commodity sectors currently offer positive carry, with precious and industrial metals mostly remain in contango, although zinc is a notable exception. This does not automatically signal weak fundamentals. Metals typically trade in contango because forward prices incorporate financing, storage and other carrying costs. With USD funding costs still elevated, with the 12-month rate around 4.2%, gold, silver and several industrial metals face a higher hurdle before moving into backwardation.

Zinc’s positive roll yield is therefore particularly noteworthy, reflecting the supply-side tightness supporting the metal. Copper, by contrast, remains in modest contango despite prices near record levels, illustrating why curve structure must be interpreted differently across sectors.

Agriculture presents a mixed picture, with some markets moving towards stronger backwardation while others remain in contango depending on inventories, harvest and weather expectations and immediate supply availability.

Carry has become an important part of the commodity story

Investors focusing exclusively on spot-price performance risk overlooking an increasingly important component of commodity returns.

The trailing difference between BCOM Total Return and Spot performance points to a substantial contribution from rolling futures exposure. The BCOM gross roll yield - measured as the 12-month return difference between the Total Return and Spot indices - has risen to around 8.8 percentage points, close to its strongest level in five years. However, as the chart shows, this return has been driven exclusively by strength in energy, raising the possibility of lower carry once the energy supply situation normalises. At the same time, emerging signs of tightness across key agricultural commodities, driven by war and weather, have not yet translated into meaningful backwardation, as seen during the 2022–2024 period following the beginning of Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Current futures curves still indicate positive aggregate carry, although at a more moderate pace than the exceptional contribution realised over the past year. Based on current BCOM target weights and one-year implied roll yields across its 25 constituent commodities, the weighted implied roll yield is around 3.3%.

The distinction matters: 8.8 percentage points describes the favourable curve conditions experienced over the past year, while 3.3% is a snapshot of currently implied carry, not a forecast of future realised returns.

Overall, commodity markets are being supported by supply constraints, rising spot prices and a futures-curve structure that continues to reward long exposure. As long as physical tightness persists - particularly across energy - backwardation provides an additional tailwind supporting the case for buying corrections rather than automatically treating them as the start of a broader reversal.

A meaningful flattening of these curves, or a shift back towards contango, would instead warn that physical tightness is easing. Watching the shape of the curve may therefore be almost as important as watching the price itself.

  • Ole S Hansen's articles on Saxo
  • For market commentary and insights - not trading advice - follow me and join the conversation on Twitter and Substack
预览 PDF
1 / 110%

正在载入文档……

AI 分析
由 AI 依据上文研报生成 · 非原文直译、非机构原话 · 重要判断请核对官网原文
关键论点
  • 紧张的大宗商品市场提供两种回报来源:现货价格上涨和期货贴水带来的正展期收益。
  • 能源板块引领贴水,多个合约的一年隐含展期收益率超过20%。
  • 曲线结构与价格方向同样重要;升水通过负展期收益侵蚀回报。
  • 金属市场的升水因融资成本而正常,但锌的贴水表明供应紧张。
  • 展期收益贡献显著(过去一年为8.8个百分点),但主要集中在能源。
  • 当前隐含加权展期收益率约为3.3%,表明未来carry较为温和。
风险
  • 能源供应正常化可能降低展期收益率,减少大宗商品指数回报。
  • 从贴水转为升水将表明实物紧张缓解,并构成警告信号。
  • 宏观经济因素、获利了结或风险情绪改善可能引发回调。
  • 在升水市场中,如果现货价格未能充分上涨,负展期收益将侵蚀回报。