我们从Warsh主席这里得到的比从他迄今两次FOMC会议上得到的要多得多。他急于不提供前瞻指引,但他的言辞却带有前瞻指引的味道;他整体偏鹰派。这并不保证任何事情,但作为反应,短期利率上升,长期利率下降。这似乎是合理的。如预期,没有关于国债回购的消息
Warsh引导前进而不提供前瞻指引
沃什的鹰派言论使收益率曲线趋平
在杰克逊霍尔研讨会上,沃什主席的措辞比他在联邦公开市场委员会会议上提出的平淡价格稳定目标更为鹰派。关键评论:
价格稳定并非自动实现,通胀也未必均值回归。实现价格稳定是美联储的职责。
这一点,加上承认通胀远高于2%,明确传达了主席的鹰派基调。
此外,沃什指出通胀趋势并未显著改善,而美联储2%的PCE通胀目标坚定不移。他还提到与人工智能相关的强劲资本支出增长,指出信贷利差较低且发行量强劲,商业和贷款市场活跃;强调货币条件并不具有限制性。他还注意到劳动力市场稳定和申领失业金人数较低。沃什主席最后指出,市场对通胀的预期较为放松,并坚信这些预期可以实现,美联储的职责是确保通胀不会失锚。他在此处的表述较为平衡,但总体偏鹰派。
收益率曲线两端均趋平。前端受损(2年期收益率),后端则有所缓解(30年期收益率略有下降)。10年期收益率涨跌互现,但通胀盈亏平衡点略降。曲线5年期部分也在去化(变便宜),这指向对加息风险的担忧加剧。2年期收益率升至4.3%,推动与联邦基金利率的利差扩大至超过66bp。通常当该利差达到75bp时,市场已定价即将加息。九月份联邦公开市场委员会会议被重新定价为掷硬币般不确定。在讲话之前,加息概率为34%。现在为54%。
他还就美联储预测未来的能力发表了谦逊的评论,并指出市场关注美联储的前瞻指引,而美联储反过来关注市场预期性反映,这并非最优结果。因此,减少前瞻指引有其合理性。
尽管如此,他今天的表态足以验证市场此前已经偏向加息风险的贴现。该贴现已得到强化。我们对通胀及其在2027,之前下降路径的看法更为积极,且无需加息。但可能有一种感觉是,更广泛的联邦公开市场委员会可能没有我们那样的耐心等待通胀回落。事实上,九月份的会议如今已成市场掷硬币之事。
沃什主席未就财政赤字、财政部长贝森特的回购计划或美元发表任何言论。这一点完全不令人意外。那是美国财政部的职责。他坚守本分。
完整英文原文
We got far more here from Chair Warsh then we were getting from his two FOMC meetings to date. He was keen not to provide forward guidance, but his words smacked of forward guidance; he was net hawkish. That does not guarantee anything, but front end rates are higher and back end rates lower as a reaction. Seems fair. Nothing on the Treasury buybacks, as expected
Warsh's hawkish words pivots the curve flatter
At the Jackson Hole Symposium, Chair Warsh struck a more hawkish tone than the bland price stability ambition that he had opined on from FOMC meetings. Key Comment:
Price stability is not self-executing, nor is inflation necessarily mean-reverting. It is the Fed’s job to deliver stable prices.
That, with the acknowledgement that inflation is well above 2%, struck a clear tone of hawkishness from the Chair.
To boot, Warsh noted that the inflation trend has not meaningfully improved, while the Fed's 2% PCE inflation objective is firm. He also made reference to strong capex growth related to AI, noted low credit spreads and strong issuance, and that commercial and loans markets were buoyant; emphasising that monetary conditions are not restrictive. He also noted a stable labour market and low jobless claims. Chair Warsh concluded by noting that market expectations are relaxed on inflation, and asserted a belief that such expectations can be achieved, with the Fed's job to ensure that inflation does not become un-anchored. He was more balanced here, but net hawkish overall.
The yield curve has come out of this flatter from both ends. The front end has been hurt (2yr yield), while the back end has been comforted (30yr yield a tad down). The 10yr yield is mixed, but the inflation breakeven a tad lower. The 5yr part of the curve is de-richening (cheapening) also, which points to an increased worry on the rate hike risk. The 2yr yield is up to 4.3%, pushing the carry spread to the funds rate out to above 66bp. Typically, when that gets to 75bp there is an imminent hike priced. The September FOMC meeting has been re-priced as a toss of a coin. Before the speech, it was priced at a 34% probability for a hike. It's now at 54%.
He also made some humbling remarks on the ability of the Fed to forecast the future, and noted that the markets watching the Fed for forward guidance, and the Fed in turn watching market reflective expectations, is not an optimal outcome. Hence, the rationale for less forward guidance.
That said, he has done enough today to validate the market discount that had been biased in the direction of a rate hike risk to begin with. That discount has hardened. We are far more constructive on inflation, and its path lower through 2027, and without the need for hikes. But there may well be a sense here that the wider FOMC might not have the same patience that we have on the timing of inflation falls. As it is, the September meeting is now a market toss-up.
Nothing from Chair Warsh on the fiscal deficit, or on Treasury Secretary Bessent's market buybacks or on the US dollar. Absolutely no surprises there. That's for the US Treasury to opine on. He stuck to his lane.
预览 PDF
正在载入文档……
关键论点
- Warsh的言论整体偏鹰,强调价格稳定不会自动实现,且通胀远高于2%。
- 收益率曲线趋平,短端受损,长端得到安抚。
- 9月FOMC会议成为悬念,加息概率为54%。
- ING对通胀及2027年下行路径仍持建设性看法,无需加息。
- 如预期,未对财政赤字、回购或美元发表评论。
风险
- 如果FOMC缺乏耐心,加息可能比ING预期的更早发生。
- 如果利差达到75个基点,市场对加息的定价可能自我实现。
- 通胀可能不会如假设那样均值回归,可能需要政策行动。