II 全球机构情报
野村证券 · 2026/08/26

欧洲可再生能源市场处于十字路口

前往官网原文 ↗
完整研报正文
完整中文译文

欧洲可再生能源市场处于十字路口

在电动汽车带来的新增电力需求背景下,欧洲可再生能源市场正处于转折点;若政策激励到位,便可充分发挥其潜力。

野村绿科技的可持续发展领袖峰会在奥地利萨尔茨堡举行,与会的资深高管表示,欧洲的能源转型是一个数十年的黄金基础设施机遇,政策制定者正努力加速市场整合并解决电网约束挑战。

根据彭博新能源财经数据,仅风能和太阳能,到2050年,欧洲可再生能源需求规模就高达€2.2万亿欧元的资本支出。这一需求由电动汽车和数字基础设施的电力需求推动,两者分别以12.3%%和9.2%%的复合年增长率扩张。此外,到2030,年,欧洲必须淘汰包括煤电在内的50吉瓦化石燃料发电装机,由此产生直接的替代需求。总体来看,到2050年,欧洲电力消费预计将增长超过70%%,达到4,980太瓦时。

同时,进一步加速可再生能源部署的关键在于实现系统整合和电网基础设施建设,这与可再生能源发展相辅相成。电网需要重新配置,以管理数以百万计的本地化风能和太阳能电源,而非数十个集中式发电站。需要建设€2公里的电网扩建和-2.3万亿欧元的基建投资,以适应分布式发电和管理间歇性。

然而,近来我们看到负批发电价小时数激增,表明电网基础设施滞后于需求。2025年,丹麦和法国的负电价小时数达到6%小时,原因是太阳能和风能饱和导致周末和节假日等低需求时段电价下跌。欧洲各地的批发电价差异依然较大,从€40欧元/兆瓦时至€122欧元/兆瓦时不等。

此外,欧洲可再生能源市场并非单一整合体系,而是由不同监管框架和定价动态的各成员国机制拼凑而成。尽管主要互连器(连接邻国电网的高压电缆)正在建设和规划中,但进展不一,市场耦合仍处于推进阶段。1.4吉瓦的瑞典-德国互连器暂停,凸显了跨境整合面临的政治和技术障碍。这种碎片化造成局部供需失衡,加剧供应过剩市场的负电价,而其他市场则受容量限制。另一个挑战是许可审批瓶颈,开发商在项目获批前往往需应对繁琐程序。尽管如此,欧盟委员会正在实施措施以简化和加快许可流程。

综上所述,这意味着投资者必须在一系列具有不同风险收益特征的微观市场中导航,权衡其相对吸引力,因为不同国家和技术的投资各不相同。这意味着资产选址和市场选择与技术选择同等重要。就现状而言,欧洲大陆最具吸引力的市场是德国和波兰,而北欧市场仍面临更大挑战。

与此同时,资本成本尚未完全正常化:尽管较2022至-2023年的峰值有所回落,但相比2018年基线,海上风电、陆上风电、光伏和电池储能的资本支出仍处于高位。俄罗斯-乌克兰战争后的通胀飙升和利率周期也推高了资本成本,压缩了长期、资本密集型资产的回报。收入结构正转向差价合约和购电协议,这提供了稳定性但限制了上行空间,而现货市场敞口则带来波动,许多投资者不愿承担。所有这些意味着,尽管增长可期,但为保护利润率,投资者需要优化项目经济性,涵盖资本支出、运营表现、融资成本和商业化。

私人资本可用于继续为欧洲的增长提供资金。大型战略投资者(具有现有资本市场渠道)和独立电力生产商均可实现预期目标。好消息是,欧洲主要公用事业公司已公开承诺,为实现2026至-2030,年600吉瓦的容量目标,承担约一半的投资,预计资本支出为€335亿欧元。另一半必须来自独立电力生产商和私人资本。全球范围内,自2015,年以来,能源转型基金已筹集约€200亿欧元,目前可用的干火药为€80亿欧元。目前,受IPO市场低迷影响,资金部署受限。

这带来了挑战:该行业需要大规模、耐心、长期的资本,但传统的上市和战略并购退出路径已经收窄。私募股权和基础设施基金正在介入,但面临严格的回报门槛。

总之,峰会高管认为,欧洲的能源转型既不可避免,也具有投资价值。所需的资本部署规模——仅发电就需要€2.2万亿欧元,加上储能和电网基础设施的额外数万亿欧元——为各类投资者创造了数十年的机遇。结构性需求增长有保障,由政府主导的净零目标和电气化目标驱动。市场整合和电网建设的政策努力,可成为长期顺风,以抵消负电价小时数和市场碎片化。

欧洲可再生能源行业青睐耐心的资本、卓越的运营和纪律性的市场选择。能够驾驭道路颠簸的投资者应能发现良机,而只关注增长叙事的投资者可能发现回报难以捉摸。

如需更多信息,请联系Laurent Dallet或Christopher Mayer。

本内容由野村仅为信息目的编制,并非出售或购买或提供(视情况而定)任何证券、产品、服务(包括但不限于投资咨询服务)或投资的要约,亦非招揽出售或购买或订立任何相关协议的要约。内容中表达的意见不构成投资建议,适当时应寻求独立建议。本内容仅包含一般信息,未考虑个人的目标、财务状况或需求。内容中表达的所有信息、意见和估计均为发布日期当日的最新信息,如有变更恕不另行通知,并可能随时间推移而过时。若本内容中提及的任何材料或投资服务在任何司法管辖区的当地法律下被解释为受监管活动,并向该司法管辖区的居民提供,则仅应通过该司法管辖区经适当许可的野村实体提供,或通过该司法管辖区豁免适用许可和监管要求的野村实体提供。更多信息请访问 https://www.nomuraholdings.com/policy/terms.html。

完整英文原文

Europe’s renewables market is at an inflection point amid new electricity demand from electric vehicles; with the right policy incentives in place, it can realize its full potential

Europe's renewable energy transformation is a golden multi-decade infrastructure opportunity with policy makers striving to accelerate market integration and solve grid constraint challenges, according to senior executives at Nomura Greentech’s Sustainable Leaders Summit in Salzburg, Austria.

The scale of Europe's renewables requirement stands at a massive €2.2 trillion in capital expenditure through 2050 for wind and solar alone, according to BNEF data. This is being driven by power demand from electric vehicles, and digital infrastructure, which are expanding at a 12.3% compound annual growth rate and 9.2%, respectively. In addition, Europe must retire 50 GW of fossil fuel generation, including coal, by 2030, creating immediate replacement demand. Overall, European power consumption is projected to grow more than 70% to 4,980 TWh by 2050.

At the same time, what is required to supercharge further rollout of renewables, is enabling system integration and building out the grid infrastructure, which go hand in hand with renewables growth. The grid needs reconfiguring to manage millions of localized wind and solar sources rather than dozens of centralized power stations. Seven million kilometers of network expansion and €2-2.3 trillion in infrastructure investment is needed to accommodate distributed generation and manage intermittency.

However, we have recently seen the rise of negative wholesale pricing hours, demonstrating that the grid infrastructure is lagging behind demand. Negative hours reached 6% in Denmark and France during 2025 as solar and wind saturation reduces prices during low-demand periods such as weekends and holidays. Wholesale price dispersion across Europe remains wide, ranging from €40/MWh to €122/MWh.

In addition, Europe's renewable energy market is not a single integrated system but a patchwork of national regimes with divergent regulatory frameworks, and pricing dynamics. While major interconnectors - high voltage power cables linking energy grids in neighbouring countries - are under construction and planned, progress is uneven, and market coupling is still a work in progress. The suspension of the 1.4 GW Sweden-Germany interconnector highlights the political and technical barriers to cross-border integration. This fragmentation creates localized supply-demand imbalances, worsening negative pricing in oversupplied markets while leaving others capacity-constrained. Another challenge is the permitting bottleneck with developers often contending with red tape before new projects are approved. That said, the European Commission is implementing measures to streamline and fast track permitting.

Taken together, this means that investors must navigate a series of micro-markets with distinct risk-return profiles weighing up their relative attractiveness as the investment differs across countries and technologies. It means that asset location and market selection are as critical as technology choice. In its current state the most attractive markets are Germany & Poland within Continental Europe whereas the Nordic markets remain more challenging.

Meanwhile, capital costs have not fully normalized: offshore wind, onshore wind, solar PV, and battery storage capital expenditure remain elevated compared to 2018 baselines despite some retreat from 2022-2023 peaks. The cost of capital has also reset higher following the inflation spike and interest rate cycle following the Russia-Ukraine war, compressing returns on long-duration, capital-intensive assets. Revenue structures are shifting toward contracts-for-difference and power purchase agreements, which provide stability but cap upside, while merchant exposure introduces volatility that many investors are unwilling to underwrite. All of this means that while growth is assured, to protect margins investors need to work on optimizing project economics across capital expenditure, operating performance, financing costs and commercialization.

Private capital is available to continue to fund the growth across Europe. Both large strategics (with existing capital market access) as well as independent power producers (IPPs) to deliver the anticipated targets. The good news is that major European utilities have publicly committed to about half of the 600 GW capacity target for 2026-2030, at an estimated €335 billion in capital expenditure. The other half must come from IPPs and private capital. Globally, energy transition funds have raised approximately €200 billion since 2015, with €80 billion in dry powder currently available. At present, deployment is constrained by a subdued IPO market.

This creates a challenge: the sector requires patient, long-duration capital at scale, yet the traditional exit pathways of public listings and strategic M&A have narrowed. Private equity and infrastructure funds are stepping in but have strict return hurdles.

In short, summit executives see Europe's renewable energy transition as both inevitable and investable. The scale of capital deployment required - €2.2 trillion for generation alone, with trillions more for storage and grid infrastructure - creates a multi-decade opportunity for a range of investors. Structural demand growth is guaranteed, driven by government-led net zero mandates and electrification goals. Policy efforts on market integration and building out the grid, could act as a long-term tailwind to offset negative pricing hours and market fragmentation.

Europe’s renewables sector favours patient capital, operational excellence, and disciplined market selection. Investors who can navigate the bumps in the road should find good opportunities while those who focus only on the growth narrative may find returns elusive.

For more information, please contact Laurent Dallet or Christopher Mayer.

This content has been prepared by Nomura solely for information purposes, and is not an offer to buy or sell or provide (as the case may be) or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell or enter into any agreement with respect to any security, product, service (including but not limited to investment advisory services) or investment. The opinions expressed in the content do not constitute investment advice and independent advice should be sought where appropriate.The content contains general information only and does not take into account the individual objectives, financial situation or needs of a person. All information, opinions and estimates expressed in the content are current as of the date of publication, are subject to change without notice, and may become outdated over time. To the extent that any materials or investment services on or referred to in the content are construed to be regulated activities under the local laws of any jurisdiction and are made available to persons resident in such jurisdiction, they shall only be made available through appropriately licenced Nomura entities in that jurisdiction or otherwise through Nomura entities that are exempt from applicable licensing and regulatory requirements in that jurisdiction. For more information please go to https://www.nomuraholdings.com/policy/terms.html.

预览 PDF
1 / 110%

正在载入文档……

AI 分析
由 AI 依据上文研报生成 · 非原文直译、非机构原话 · 重要判断请核对官网原文
关键论点
  • 欧洲可再生能源仅风电和光伏就需要到2050年投入2.2万亿欧元的资本支出。
  • 电动汽车和数字基础设施的电力需求分别以12.3%和9.2%的复合年增长率增长。
  • 欧洲必须在2030年前淘汰50吉瓦的化石燃料发电,产生直接的替代需求。
  • 需要700万公里的电网扩建和2至2.3万亿欧元的电网投资。
  • 2025年丹麦和法国的负电价小时数达到6%,表明电网滞后。
  • 市场碎片化和许可瓶颈是关键挑战。
  • 德国和波兰是最具吸引力的市场,而北欧市场更具挑战性。
  • 资本成本仍处于高位,压缩了资本密集型资产的回报。
风险
  • 负批发电价小时数可能侵蚀可再生能源项目收入。
  • 各国制度的市场碎片化造成局部失衡。
  • 许可瓶颈延误项目审批。
  • 资本成本仍较高,压缩回报。
  • IPO市场低迷制约退出路径。
  • 资本成本重置更高,降低了资本密集型资产的吸引力。