美国财政部已打响第一枪,目前看来一切顺利。长期收益率下降,互换利差收窄。但这并非改天换地之举,因为潜在压力依旧存在。周五的杰克逊霍尔研讨会提供了一个不错的分散注意力的机会。但在此之后,随着人们意识到我们对美联储的判断并未因此更加清晰,长期收益率压力蓄势待发。
利率快讯:为何4.75%是10年期收益率的自然选择
将4.5%至5%作为10年期收益率的关键边界区间
我们获得了7月份的核心个人消费支出通胀数据,同比为3.3%。同时确认GDP增长为1.5%。简单相加,得到4.8%。传统上,这样的名义增长数字与国债收益率水平会有合理的关系。人们认为,它为较长期限的收益率(如10年期)提供了更好的指引,因为较短期限的收益率更多由美联储设定的联邦基金利率主导。这个简单的4.8%水平具有相关性,因为它可以作为10年期收益率的简单相对价值参考。可以这样理解:任何接近该水平的收益率都可被视为公允价值的体现,或者至少是讨论公允价值可能在哪里的起点。再加上约占GDP的6%财政赤字,公允价值水平将高于此。粗略估计,5%的10年期收益率并非疯狂水平。
美国财政部决定将长期限回购规模“增加一倍以上”,当时10年期收益率为4.7%,处于同一区域,但显然低于4.8%;以及5%。部分逻辑是为了在8月流动性淡季提供支持。但回购将于9年9月开始。因此,毫无疑问,回购主要是为了抑制长期收益率上升的威胁。公平地说,财政部长确实直接提到了这一点。然而,复杂因素是,我们几乎还没有处于长期收益率失控的水平。根据我们的粗略估算,4.7%水平在当前情况下与公允价值相差不大。我们现在已降至4.65%,因此财政部长无疑到目前为止感到满意。此外,30年期互换利差收紧了6bp,这代表30年期收益率相对于30年期无风险利率(SOFR)的绝对走强。
但这场游戏远未结束。与最近日元干预类似,引发干预的根本力量尚未得到解决。就日元而言,日本央行需要加息。从日元的角度来看,他们越早达到2%(目前为1%)越好。实际上,他们应该在9月会议上至少加息50bp。但传统观点认为他们只会加息25bp,这意味着压力不会消失。美国长期国债收益率也是如此。推动美国长期收益率上升的因素并未消失。我们将其概括为发行压力(包括各种竞争性发行)和强劲的生产力驱动的企业部门(包括科技繁荣)。这些因素尤其推高了实际收益率。市场通胀盈亏平衡点实际上表现良好(远低于同期通胀数据)。事实上,这些可能会上升。
综合考虑,如果回购计划旨在结构性压低长期收益率,那么未来将有一场仗要打。我们经历了第一场战斗,财政部取得了胜利。但还会有更多战斗。因此,我们认为10年期收益率不太可能很快跌破4.5%。压力仍然存在,可能突破至4.75-5%区域。一个明显的障碍来自美国财政部可能决定进行更大规模回购的前景。他们已经有回旋余地,因为他们打算“至少”加倍。但正如我们之前指出的,他们可以再次加倍,如果需要的话甚至更多。好消息是,这并不是在保护一个离谱的水平。如前所述,我们与公允价值相差不大。但这确实有助于在5%水平确立一个不成文的上限。这是10年期收益率的更宽区间:4.5%至5%。我们暂时会在中间区间稳定下来。
周三事件与市场观点
杰克逊霍尔会议将于今日开幕,尽管我们不预期美联储主席沃什会提供太多可操作的信息,但市场将密切关注他的言论。数据方面,美国每周初请失业金人数是最值得关注的数字。
供应方面,美国将拍卖$44亿美元的新7年期国债。
完整英文原文
We've had the opening salvo from the US Treasury, and so far so good. Long-end yields are down and swap spreads tighter. But it's no game changer, as the underlying pressures remain. Friday's Jackson Hole Symposium offers a nice distraction. But post that, as the realisation dawns that we're none the wiser on the Fed, long-end pressure is primed to re-build
Mapping 4.5% to 5% as the key extremity bands for the 10yr yield
We got core personal consumer expenditure inflation for July, running at 3.3% YoY. We also got confirmation of GDP growth running at 1.5%. Simplistically, add the two together and we get 4.8%. Traditionally, a nominal growth number like this would have a reasonable relationship with the level of Treasury yields. And the thinking is that it provides a better guide for longer tenor yields (like the 10yr yield), as shorter ones are bossed more by where the Fed pitches the funds rate. That simple 4.8% level is relevant, as it can be deployed as a plain relative value reference for the 10yr yield. The thinking could be that anything around that yield could be construed as representing fair value, or at least the starting point for a conversation on where fair value might be. Add an approximately 6% fiscal deficit as a percent of GDP, and the fair value level would be to the upside of that. Ballpark, a 5% 10yr yield would not be a crazy level.
The US Treasury decided to "more than double" the size of long-end buybacks with the 10yr yield at 4.7%, which is in the same region, but obviously lower than 4.8%; and 5%. Part of the logic was to support liquidity through the thin August period. But the buybacks commence on 9 September. Hence, there is little doubt that the buybacks are being undertaken predominantly as a curb to the rising long-end yields threat. And in fairness, the Treasury Secretary did make direct reference to this. The complicating factor, however, is we were hardly at unruly levels of long-end yields. Our back-of-the-envelope numbers suggest the 4.7% level is not too deviant from fair valuation levels given current circumstances. We're now down at 4.65%, so the Treasury Secretary, no doubt, is pleased so far. Moreover, the 30yr swap spread is tighter by 6bp, which represents an absolute richening of the 30yr yield versus the 30yr risk-free rate (SOFR).
But this game is far from done. Similar to the recent yen intervention, the underlying forces that prompted it have not been dealt with. In the case of the yen, the Bank of Japan needs to hike rates. The sooner they get to 2% (now 1%) the better from the perspective of the yen. Really, they should be delivering a 50bp hike (at least) from the September meeting. But conventional thinking is they just do 25bp, which means the pressure does not go away. The same applies to long-end Treasury yields. The factors that have placed upward pressure on US long yields have not gone away. We summarise these as issuance pressure (including all types of competing issuance) and a strong productivity-driven corporate sector (incorporating a tech boom). These in particular have pressured real yields higher. Market inflation break-evens are in fact fine (far below contemporaneous inflation prints). In fact, these could rise.
All things considered, if the buyback plan is there to bully long-end yields lower on a structural basis, there is a war to be fought ahead. We've had the first battle, and the Treasury has been victorious. But there'll be more. Consequently, we don't see a break below 4.5% on the 10yr yield as probable any time soon. The pressure remains for a break higher to the 4.75-5% zone. A clear obstacle comes from the prospect of the US Treasury deciding to do bigger buybacks. They already have leeway, as they intend to do "at least" double. But as we've noted before, they could double it again, and again if needed. The good news is this is not protection of an outrageous level. As noted, we're not that deviant from a fair valuation. But it does help to cement an unwritten cap at 5%. That's the wider range for the 10yr yield; 4.5% to 5%. We'll settle in between for now.
Wednesday's events and market views
Jackson Hole will kick off today, and although we don’t expect Fed Chair Warsh to provide much to work with, markets will be closely weighing his words. In terms of data, we have weekly jobless claims from the US as the most notable figure.
For supply, we have the US auction $44bn of a new 7y Note.
预览 PDF
正在载入文档……
关键论点
- 4.8%的名义GDP增长(3.3%核心PCE + 1.5%GDP)作为10年期收益率的简单公允价值参考。
- 财政赤字占GDP约6%,推动公允价值高于4.8%,使10年期收益率约5%成为合理水平。
- 财政部决定将长端回购规模“增加一倍以上”,主要是为了抑制长端收益率上升,但并未解决发行和生产率压力等根本问题。
- 类似日元干预,回购计划只是短期缓解,长端收益率压力会随时间重建。
- 10年期收益率区间为4.5%-5%,压力偏向4.75%-5%区间,短期内跌破4.5%的可能性不大。
- 回购计划强化了5%的非正式上限,但财政部如有需要可再次加倍回购。
风险
- 美国财政部可能进一步加倍回购,对长端收益率形成更强上限。
- 市场通胀预期可能上升,增加名义收益率压力。
- 杰克逊霍尔会议上美联储主席沃什的评论若超预期,可能引发波动。
- 日本央行仅加息25个基点而非50个基点可能延续日元弱势,但对美债收益率直接影响有限。