II Institutional Intelligence
SMBC · 08/25/2026

buybacks

Official source ↗
Complete Research
Complete English original
US Rates Strategy Joseph Abate August 25, 2026 joseph.abate@smbcnikko-si.com 1 212 893-1592 Increasing buyback firepower We think the Treasury could increase its buyback capacity without necessarily increasing bill issuance by drawing on some of its surplus cash. Term buybacks totaling $100bn could be added to its existing cash management buyback operations. • While the Treasury cash balance is nearly $1trn, only the portion above its 5d expected outflows is available for buybacks or investing in the repo market. • Without changing bill issuance or reducing its precautionary cash target, we estimate it could shift $100bn from its Fed account to purchases of term debt. This would replace any tri-party repo investments. • Diverting this cash from repo to buybacks will likely have little effect on general collateral rates. But it may be more pronounced in the bilateral repo where financing and liquidity could improve for the vintage coupons the Treasury is redeeming. • Treasury’s surplus cash is lumpy and highest around tax collection dates. As a result, term buybacks might be concentrated around the same time as the Treasury’s regular cash management buyback operations . • The Treasury’s cash management buybacks total $150bn/yr and include bills and vintage coupons out to 2y. Individual operations are between $12.5bn and $15bn (par). Demand for buybacks is strong in this part of the curve. • Rather than replacing these maturities with longer ones, the Treasury might consider increasing the size of these operations (by $25bn/quarter) and adding longer maturities to the buybacks . • Buybacks – of whatever maturity – are sensitive to debt ceiling dynamics. Investors may need to wait for the Treasury’s cash balance to recover before they can sell their off-the-run holdings back to the Treasury. Extra cash Earlier this week, there was some discussion that the Treasury could use the cash in its account at the Fed to buy back term debt . 1 Since the Treasury has nearly $1trn in this account, tapping it could significantly increase its buyback firepower. And because this cash has already been raised from debt 1 See, “Bessent could tap near $1trn Treasury General Account to fund bond buybacks, sources said”, S. Liesman, CNBC, August 24, 2026. SMBC US Rates Strategy 2 markets and tax receipts, the Treasury would not need to issue more debt. In effect, the Treasury might be able to pull long-term interest rates lower without increasing bill supply . Instead, the Treasury would reduce the size of its cash surplus above its expected 5d outflows E(1w). 2 We do not think the Treasury would consider a smaller operating buffer – one that targets, a 3d cushion, for example . 3 While 3d would match the longest period the Treasury was unable to access financing markets since 2000, it wouldn ’t give the Treasury mu ch added padding. After all, every Tuesday and Thursday, the Treasury has between $250-$300bn in gross bill settlements. The Treasury has already been eyeing this cash . It is considering ways to boost the returns on this “ idle ” cash that earns nothing while it sits at the Fed. Dealers were asked at the May and August quarterly refundings to consider the implications of investing the surplus in the tri-party repo market. Likewise, the Fed has been considering the implications for reserve management of a change in where and how the Treasury maintains its precautionary cash balance. 4 We are skeptical that the Treasury would earn much from investing surplus cash in the repo market. 5 Instead, our sense is that tri-party repo rates would continue to trade below IORB . The extra $100bn of Treasury cash invested in a market where $1.2trn/day trades, might nudge tri-party rates lower. However, the effect is small and muted provided bank reserves remain ample. That said, using the $100bn to purchase vintage term coupons while reducing their float could lower their funding costs and improve their secondary market liquidity. How much surplus cash does the Treasury hold? We calculate E(1w) from the start of the year and subtract this amount from the Treasury ’ s daily cash holdings (Figure 1). The Treasury has had extra cash on roughly 2/3 of period. The average amount on those days is about $165bn, but there is significant variation in the daily total; the standard deviation across surplus days is about $96bn. Depending on how aggressively the Treasury wishes to use its surplus cash we think it might comfortably buy back an additional $100bn annually in term debt . This cash is lumpy. As shown in Figure 1, there are bouts during which the Treasury has no surplus or the surplus is less than $100bn. Because balances are highest around tax dates, the Treasury might concentrate its term buybacks around these dates – perhaps $25bn/quarter. The operations could be scaled up if tax receipts are stronger-than-expected. Cash management buybacks But the Treasury already uses its strong tax receipts to conduct periodic cash management buyback operations. These operations are meant to smooth out the Treasury ’s cas h flows while flattening out seasonal swings in bill issuance . Before these operations began in 2024, April tax collections caused the Treasury ’s cash balance to spike . While this is still true, the Treasury no longer needs to shrink bill issuance as aggressively in May and June to bring its cash back to its E(1w) target. Instead, it uses $150bn of its cash to retire bills and coupons out to 2y. Individual operations are between $12.5bn and $15bn (par). This helps to stabilize bill issuance while reducing the seasonal effects on short-term interest rates caused by money fund reallocations from scarce bills to overnight repo. 2 E(1w) is the Treasury’s expected cash outflow; in our analysis we assume the expected outflow equals the realized outflow. 3 See, “Remarks by PDO Assistant Secretary McMaster”, US Treasury, September 29, 2025. 4 See, “Options for reducing the size of the Fed’s balance sheet”, L. Logan and S. Schulhofer-Wohl, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, April 2, 2026 5 In the May refunding, TBAC estimates that the Treasury might only earn an extra $60-100mn annually. SMBC US Rates Strategy 3 The demand to sell the short maturity debt to the Treasury is strong but not as strong as it is for longer maturity coupons (Figure 2). As a result, the Treasury might not want to replace the maturities of its quarterly cash management operations with term debt. Instead, it might add an extra $25bn/quarter in term debt buybacks to its existing cash management purchases . Debt ceiling In this analysis we have ignored the effect of the debt ceiling. The debt ceiling becomes binding when borrowing capacity created from the Treasury ’ s extraordinary accounting measures runs down. This forces the Treasury to operate with a thinner cash balance and means it would have to suspend its buybacks. If the Treasury scales up its buybacks but is later forced to suspend them, investors wishing to reduce their inventories of off-the-run paper might instead have to wait until Congress approves a limit increase (or temporary suspension) for the Treasury ’s purchases to resume. Figure 1: Daily cash less E(1w) ($bn) Figure 2 : Par offer to max ratios by sector Source: US Treasury, SMBC Nikko Note: Average over the last 10 operations. Source: US Treasury, SMBC Nikko -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 Nov-25 Jan-26 Mar-26 May-26 Jul-26 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Cash management 10-20y 20-30y
Publisher disclaimer
SMBC US Rates Strategy 4 Disclaimers This document is provided by SMBC Group (including, collectively or individually, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, SMBC Nikko Securities America, Inc., and their affiliates, as applicable) for informational purposes only, solely for use by the client(s) or potential client(s) to whom such document is directly addressed and delivered. This document does not constitute an offer or solicitation of the sale or purchase of securities or other investments. This document was prepared by SMBC Group’s economist(s). The information contained herein is obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable, but SMBC Group and the economist(s) make no representations as to its accuracy or completeness. In some cases, such information may be incomplete or summarized. The views, statements, assumptions, and forecasts expressed herein are those of the economist(s) and do not reflect the judgment of any other person or of SMBC Group. This document has been prepared based on assumptions and parameters determined by SMBC Group’s economist(s) in good faith. The assumptions and parameters used are not the only ones that could have been selected, and therefore no guarantee is given as to the accuracy, completeness, or reasonableness of any such quotations, disclosures, or analyses. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of any future results. This document has been prepared for, and is directed at, institutional investors and other market professionals and is not intended for use by retail customers. It does not take into account any specific investment objective, financial situation, or particular need of any recipient(s). The information contained herein should, for whatever purpose, be used solely at the discretion and responsibility of the recipient(s). SMBC Group does not accept any liability or responsibility for any results in connection with the use of the information. Recipients are responsible for making final investment decisions and should do so at their own discretion following their own independent analysis and assessment of the merits of any transaction prior to execution, after conducting a careful examination of all documentation delivered, explanatory documents pertaining to listed securities, prospectuses, and other relevant documents. Any financial instruments discussed in this document may be speculative and may involve risks to principal and interest. Conflicts of Interest Disclosures The views, statements, assumptions, and forecasts expressed herein may differ from those expressed in the globally branded research produced by SMBC Group. The trading desks of SMBC Group trade or may trade as principal in the financial instruments that are the subject of this document, and the economist(s) may have consulted with the trading desks while preparing the document. The proprietary interests of SMBC Group may conflict with those of the recipient(s). SMBC Group may seek to do business with companies mentioned in this material and the trading desks may accumulate, be in the process of accumulating or have accumulated, long or short positions in financial instruments mentioned and may have acquired them at prices no longer available. The trading desks may also have or take positions inconsistent with the views expressed in this document or may have already traded on those views. This document is not a research report, and neither the document nor the economist(s) is/are subject to policies and procedures that apply to the globally branded research reports and research analysts of SMBC Group or to legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. This document is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. This means that SMBC Group, and its directors, representatives, or employees, may have a long or short position in any financial instruments mentioned in this document and may make a market or trade in financial instruments economically related to the securities, derivatives or other underlying assets mentioned herein, in each case either as principal or as agent, at any time. No part of economist compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed herein. The personal views of economists may differ from one another. This document is the property of SMBC Group, subject to copyright. Any reproduction of this document, in whole or in part, is prohibited and you may not release this document to any person, except to your advisors and professionals to assist you in evaluating the document, provided that they are obligated by law or agreement to keep the document confidential. Distribution, possession or delivery of this document in, to, or from certain jurisdictions may be restricted or prohibited by law. Recipients of this document are required to inform themselves of and comply with all such restrictions or prohibitions. © 2026 SMBC Group. All rights reserved.
Preview PDF
AI analysis
AI-generated from the report above · not a translation and not the institution's wording · verify against the official source
Key arguments
  • The Treasury's surplus cash above its 5-day expected outflows could be used for buybacks without increasing bill issuance.
  • An additional $100bn in term buybacks could be added to existing cash management buyback operations.
  • Shifting cash from repo to buybacks likely has little effect on general collateral rates but may improve bilateral repo conditions for vintage coupons.
  • Surplus cash is lumpy and highest around tax dates, suggesting term buybacks might be concentrated in those periods.
  • Rather than replacing maturities, the Treasury might add $25bn/quarter in term buybacks and include longer maturities.
  • Buybacks are sensitive to debt ceiling dynamics, as a binding ceiling could force suspension.
  • Investing surplus cash in repo markets would yield little, with rates likely remaining below IORB.
  • Using $100bn to purchase vintage coupons could lower their funding costs and improve liquidity.
Risks
  • Debt ceiling dynamics could force the Treasury to suspend buybacks, leaving investors unable to sell off-the-run holdings.
  • Surplus cash is lumpy and may be insufficient at times, limiting the timing and size of buybacks.
  • Scaled-up buybacks could be constrained by tax receipts being weaker than expected.
  • Investing surplus cash in repo might have low returns and could nudge tri-party rates lower.