II Institutional Intelligence
Standard Chartered · Mei Lam · 08/14/2026

Turbulence ahead: Fuel shock deepens the returns challenge

Official source ↗
Automated quality noticeThis report remains available, but its AI analysis or translation scored below the preferred quality threshold and is queued for improvement. Verify material decisions against the official source.
Complete Research
Complete English original
A six-month stress test shows most airlines remain liquid, but weaker earnings and higher leverage may further strain returns.

Rising fuel prices and supply shortage is exacerbating the returns problem

The ongoing Middle East conflict is impacting fuel prices and reducing supply. As with all previous fuel volatility episodes, earnings are disproportionately impacted. Margins are forecast to fall across every region by at least a fifth. However, the more important issue may be one that predates the conflict. Airlines have struggled to consistently generate returns above their cost of capital and higher fuel costs risk widening that gap further. Our analysis of six-month conflict-linked stress scenarios suggests over 90 per cent of airlines will generate returns below their cost of capital in 2026

Liquidity holds, but leverage will come under pressure

Liquidity remains a relative strength for the sector, but leverage is exposed. Most airlines appear well positioned to meet near-term funding needs, supported by healthy cash and committed facility buffers. Under an extended conflict scenario, however, leverage worsens, particularly in mainland China and North America, where net leverage is projected to reach 5.0x or higher. This pushes a greater share of airlines into the stress, highlighting the need to diversify funding sources.

Fuel hedging policy is now critical

Several carriers have already responded to rising fuel costs through fare increases, fuel surcharges and capacity adjustments, but operational adjustments can go so far. In a geopolitical environment where disruption seems quite frequent, perhaps fuel hedging deserves renewed attention to mitigate risks’ or similar We expect unhedged airlines to see their 2026 EBITDA contract by around 60 per cent year on year, compared with 23 per cent for heavily hedged carriers, highlighting how risk management can materially soften the financial impact of higher fuel costs.

What this means going forward

While policy changes during the crisis are difficult, our findings suggest that fuel risk management has become an increasingly important lever for preserving financial flexibility. Airlines remain broadly liquid, but leverage is increasingly a concern under a prolonged stress scenario. The carriers likely to remain most resilient are those combining effective fuel risk management with diversified funding sources, prudent liquidity buffers and sufficient balance sheet headroom. To discuss the findings and explore potential implications, contact us for a deeper analysis.

Building materials: Defending margins through uncertainty

The building materials sector faces macro uncertainty, uneven recovery and rising transition needs, making margi…
Preview PDF
AI analysis
AI-generated from the report above · not a translation and not the institution's wording · verify against the official source
Key arguments
  • Fuel price spikes from Middle East conflict will reduce airline margins by at least 20% across all regions.
  • Over 90% of airlines will fail to generate returns above their cost of capital in 2026 under stress scenarios.
  • Liquidity buffers remain healthy, but leverage exposure worsens in extended conflict, especially in mainland China and North America.
  • Fuel hedging significantly mitigates earnings impact: unhedged carriers see ~60% EBITDA contraction vs 23% for heavily hedged.
  • Airlines combining fuel risk management with diversified funding and strong balance sheets will be most resilient.
Risks
  • Extended Middle East conflict worsens fuel supply disruptions and airline leverage.
  • Fare increases and fuel surcharges may not fully offset fuel cost rises, pressuring demand.
  • Policy support during crisis may be limited, leaving airlines reliant on own risk management.
  • Unhedged carriers face severe earnings contraction, increasing default risk.