Programmable sovereignty: coordinated specialisation as a response to the N-2 problem in artificial intelligence
中文标题
可编程主权:协调专业化作为人工智能中N-2问题的应对之策
Core conclusion · Tlines extraction
Natixis introduces 'programmable sovereignty' and 'coordinated specialisation' as responses to the N-2 problem in AI, where only the US and China achieve full-stack sovereignty. The report argues that N-2 states should pool governance and hard-stack capacities, based on scorecards of seven economies, to make dependence reversible and credible.
- Institution
- Natixis
- Published
- 09/07/2026
- Research topic
- Coordinated specialisation · AI governance · Market leverage
- Time horizon
- medium-term
Key arguments
- The N-2 problem: only the US and China can pursue full-stack AI sovereignty, leaving all other states dependent on one or both.
- Programmable sovereignty: soft governance anchored by minimal hard-stack control, especially pooled compute, to make dependence reversible and governance credible.
- Coordinated specialisation: pooling comparative advantages across complementary N-2 states under a shared governance framework, inspired by Airbus.
- The EU, India, Japan, and South Korea possess governance capacity, while Taiwan and South Korea contribute fabrication and memory; no single N-2 state can achieve programmable sovereignty alone.
- Regulatory actions by the US and China, such as rare earth controls and the Anthropic episode, demonstrate how dependence is leveraged.
Key numbers
- Rare earth refining share (China)
- ~99% gallium, ~83% germanium
- US AI compute share
- ~75% of benchmarked GPU-cluster performance
- China AI compute share
- ~14%
- US private AI investment 2024
- $109.1 billion
- China private AI investment 2024
- $9.3 billion
- EU market size for AI deployment
- $20 trillion
- Japan photoresist global supply share
- ~90%
- Top 5 equipment vendors revenue share
- 56%-66%
Main risks
- Coordinated industrial strategies have a mixed record; coalition may underperform due to state-capacity constraints, weak enforcement, and rent-seeking.
- Coalition stability is uncertain; members with matured capabilities may defect and free-ride.
- Political feasibility varies; Taiwan's security ties to the US may hinder formal membership.
- The window for building alternatives is closing as supply chains and norms settle.
Corresponding source evidence
we argue that coordinated specialisation is the only feasible option available to the N-2 states.
· medium-termWhen it comes to attracting others to the partnership, the EU offers a $20 trillion market for AI deployment.
· medium-term
Conditions / invalidation
- If states adopt the proposed architecture and governance first.
- If the EU offers market access as leverage.
Context: the conclusion is Tlines' automated extraction, not the institution's wording. Quoted evidence is publisher wording. Scope and date must travel with the conclusion.
Verify at the original source ↗Loading the document…
AI analysis
How this page was produced
Tlines extracted the conclusion, arguments, numbers and risks above from the report published by Natixis on 09/07/2026, then structured them for comparison. The publisher's own wording is reachable through the source link on this page and is displayed in full above. Last updated 10/17/2026. Methodology · Source policy · AI usage · Request a correction