Tlines Intelligence
中文

Programmable sovereignty: coordinated specialisation as a response to the N-2 problem in artificial intelligence

中文标题

可编程主权:协调专业化作为人工智能中N-2问题的应对之策

Multiple economies
Citable research brief

Core conclusion · Tlines extraction

Natixis introduces 'programmable sovereignty' and 'coordinated specialisation' as responses to the N-2 problem in AI, where only the US and China achieve full-stack sovereignty. The report argues that N-2 states should pool governance and hard-stack capacities, based on scorecards of seven economies, to make dependence reversible and credible.

Institution
Natixis
Published
09/07/2026
Research topic
Coordinated specialisation · AI governance · Market leverage
Time horizon
medium-term

Key arguments

  • The N-2 problem: only the US and China can pursue full-stack AI sovereignty, leaving all other states dependent on one or both.
  • Programmable sovereignty: soft governance anchored by minimal hard-stack control, especially pooled compute, to make dependence reversible and governance credible.
  • Coordinated specialisation: pooling comparative advantages across complementary N-2 states under a shared governance framework, inspired by Airbus.
  • The EU, India, Japan, and South Korea possess governance capacity, while Taiwan and South Korea contribute fabrication and memory; no single N-2 state can achieve programmable sovereignty alone.
  • Regulatory actions by the US and China, such as rare earth controls and the Anthropic episode, demonstrate how dependence is leveraged.

Key numbers

Rare earth refining share (China)
~99% gallium, ~83% germanium
US AI compute share
~75% of benchmarked GPU-cluster performance
China AI compute share
~14%
US private AI investment 2024
$109.1 billion
China private AI investment 2024
$9.3 billion
EU market size for AI deployment
$20 trillion
Japan photoresist global supply share
~90%
Top 5 equipment vendors revenue share
56%-66%

Main risks

  • Coordinated industrial strategies have a mixed record; coalition may underperform due to state-capacity constraints, weak enforcement, and rent-seeking.
  • Coalition stability is uncertain; members with matured capabilities may defect and free-ride.
  • Political feasibility varies; Taiwan's security ties to the US may hinder formal membership.
  • The window for building alternatives is closing as supply chains and norms settle.

Corresponding source evidence

  1. we argue that coordinated specialisation is the only feasible option available to the N-2 states. · medium-term
  2. When it comes to attracting others to the partnership, the EU offers a $20 trillion market for AI deployment. · medium-term

Conditions / invalidation

  • If states adopt the proposed architecture and governance first.
  • If the EU offers market access as leverage.

Context: the conclusion is Tlines' automated extraction, not the institution's wording. Quoted evidence is publisher wording. Scope and date must travel with the conclusion.

Verify at the original source ↗

Loading the document…

AI analysis

AI-generated from the report above · not a translation and not the institution's wording · verify against the official source

How this page was produced

Tlines extracted the conclusion, arguments, numbers and risks above from the report published by Natixis on 09/07/2026, then structured them for comparison. The publisher's own wording is reachable through the source link on this page and is displayed in full above. Last updated 10/17/2026. Methodology · Source policy · AI usage · Request a correction