Tlines Intelligence
中文

Nbp governors press conference less dovish than in july but still far from market pricing of rate hikes

中文标题

NBP行长新闻发布会较7月偏鸽程度降低,但仍远不及市场对加息的定价

Citable research brief

Core conclusion · Tlines extraction

The National Bank of Poland Governor Adam Glapinski turned less dovish at his September 2026 press conference than in July, signalling an extended period of stable rates rather than a possible cut, as Middle East conflict-driven energy prices lifted August inflation to 3.4% YoY. ING maintains its baseline that Polish rates stay unchanged until mid-2027, with two 25bp cuts expected in the second half of 2026 as inflation falls back toward the 2.5% target, in contrast to market pricing of roughly 75bp of rate hikes over the next year. The Governor personally sees no change until the first half of next year, describing the current rate level as appropriate and not high.

Institution
ING THINK
Published
09/10/2026
Research topic
Inflation
Time horizon
next year · 2027 · near-term · 2026

Key arguments

  • The NBP Governor's tone was more balanced than in July, signalling a longer period of stable interest rates rather than the possibility of a cut.
  • Market pricing implies around 75bp of rate hikes over the next year, which remains inconsistent with the Governor's stance and ING's baseline.
  • Energy prices accounted for half of August headline inflation, so commodity markets — particularly Middle East developments — are now crucial to the inflation path.
  • The risk of second-round effects remains low, as consumption growth is slowing and the composition of GDP is becoming less inflationary, with the July wage jump seen as driven by one-off bonuses.
  • The MPC statement's forward guidance was almost identical to July despite August inflation at 3.4% YoY versus the 2.5% target, indicating the Governor was unlikely to shift abruptly.
  • Fuel markets are beyond the reach of monetary policy; other central banks' hikes reflected their comparatively low rate levels, not a template for Poland.

Key numbers

August CPI inflation
3.4% YoY
NBP inflation target
2.5% YoY
June CPI inflation
2.5% YoY
Market-implied rate hikes over next year
≈75bp
ING expected rate cuts in H2 2026
2 x 25bp

Main risks

  • Further escalation of the Middle East conflict could push energy prices higher and lift inflation above the NBP's tolerance band.
  • Elevated uncertainty around the nature of the shock means an NBP rate increase cannot be ruled out, though the Governor deemed it highly uncertain.
  • Higher-than-expected July wage growth and a fiscal policy envisaging no consolidation in 2027 could revive second-round inflation effects.
  • ING's dovish baseline would be invalidated if energy and commodity markets stay elevated for longer.

Corresponding source evidence

  1. Following a deterioration in the inflation outlook amid rising energy commodity prices, Glapiński was less unequivocal in his assessment, signalling a longer period of stable interest rates rather than the possibility of a cut mentioned in July.
  2. Despite this shift in the governor’s stance, which was in line with our expectations, it still contrasts with aggressive market pricing, which implies that interest rates will rise by around 75bp over the next year. · next year
  3. Assessment of macroeconomic conditions and inflation drivers: focus on energy prices While explaining yesterday’s MPC decision, Glapiński noted that inflation remained within the target range, although the latest figure for August was close to the upper limit of the inflation tolerance band.

Context: the conclusion is Tlines' automated extraction, not the institution's wording. Quoted evidence is publisher wording. Scope and date must travel with the conclusion.

Verify at the original source ↗

Loading the document…

AI analysis

AI-generated from the report above · not a translation and not the institution's wording · verify against the official source

Cross-institution comparison · CPI

How this page was produced

Tlines extracted the conclusion, arguments, numbers and risks above from the report published by ING THINK on 09/10/2026, then structured them for comparison. The publisher's own wording is reachable through the source link on this page and is displayed in full above. Last updated 10/17/2026. Methodology · Source policy · AI usage · Request a correction