Corporate esg bond issuance holds firm into 2027
中文标题
企业ESG债券发行在2027保持坚挺
Core conclusion · Tlines extraction
ING expects euro-denominated corporate ESG bond supply to reach €72bn in 2027, slightly above its €70bn estimate for 2026, with net supply rising to €41bn from €34bn as redemptions fall €5bn to €31bn. Utilities, which accounted for 66% of 2026 issuance, should stay dominant given heavy capex, and hybrids—around 25% of utility sustainable supply—should remain common. SFDR 2.0 supports structural demand, though a conservative non-hyperscaler supply view caps growth, and 80-90% of issuance has been green over two years.
- Institution
- ING THINK
- Published
- 10/21/2026
- Research topic
- Not explicitly stated
- Time horizon
- medium-term · next year
Key arguments
- ESG issuance should edge slightly above 2026 levels, aided by corporates tapping a wider sustainable investor base amid an uncertain market backdrop.
- Utilities should remain the dominant issuer given substantial capex plans, keeping sustainable hybrids commonplace to protect credit profiles and ratings.
- Refinancing of redemptions and ESG curve expansion by existing issuers, plus new entrants, underpin supply.
- A conservative overall supply outlook outside hyperscalers limits potential growth in sustainable issuance.
Key numbers
- 2027 corporate ESG supply forecast
- €72bn
- 2026 full-year estimate
- €70bn
- 2027 net supply
- €41bn
- Redemptions 2027
- €31bn (down €5bn YoY)
- Utilities' share of 2026 issuance
- 66%
Main risks
- Overall corporate supply outside hyperscalers could disappoint, capping sustainable issuance growth.
- Issuance is heavily concentrated in utilities, so a shift in that sector's capex or hybrid appetite would matter materially.
- Regulatory support such as SFDR 2.0 is assumed to persist; any change could alter demand.
Corresponding source evidence
We expect regulatory drivers such as SFDR 2.0 to continue to support structural demand for ESG bonds in the medium term.
· medium-termOver the past two years, 80-90% of issuance has been green, and we think this trend will continue next year.
· next year
Context: the conclusion is Tlines' automated extraction, not the institution's wording. Quoted evidence is publisher wording. Scope and date must travel with the conclusion.
Verify at the original source ↗Loading the document…
AI analysis
How this page was produced
Tlines extracted the conclusion, arguments, numbers and risks above from the report published by ING THINK on 10/21/2026, then structured them for comparison. The publisher's own wording is reachable through the source link on this page and is displayed in full above. Last updated 10/21/2026. Methodology · Source policy · AI usage · Request a correction