Tlines 全球机构情报
EN

Dipan Patel谈Permira的'手工艺式'私募股权方法

经济体未知
可引用研究简报

研报译文摘录

Dipan Patel,Permira联席首席执行官,做客高盛播客《Great Investors》,讨论Permira的行业专业化投资方法和私人合伙结构如何区别于那些通过平台规模和广度成长起来的公司。

机构
高盛
发布时间
2026/09/04
研究主题
原文未明确说明
时间范围
原文未明确说明

关键数字

未提取到可由原文核验的关键数字。

主要风险

提取材料中未明确给出。

对应原文证据

未提取到句级证据,请直接核验原文。

上下文:此处为自动译文摘录,并非机构原话,也不是 Tlines 结论;请对照原始研报核验。

在原始来源核验 ↗
完整研报正文
完整中文译文

Dipan Patel谈Permira的'手工艺式'私募股权方法

Dipan Patel,Permira联席首席执行官,做客高盛播客《Great Investors》,讨论Permira的行业专业化投资方法和私人合伙结构如何区别于那些通过平台规模和广度成长起来的公司。他还讨论了Permira在改造投资组合公司方面的策略,以及这些资产对战略买家具有吸引力的原因,并分享了Permira如何评估其投资组合中的技术风险。

Dipan Patel:好事发生在好公司身上,坏事发生在坏公司身上。我认为人工智能所做的只是加速了这些事情。因此,如果你是一家汇集大宗商品数据并通过大宗商品渠道和大宗商品用户体验销售这些数据的企业,你可能已经在走下坡路了;如果你是一家拥有专有数据、网络效应、极强品牌,并且你构建的用户体验是针对垂直行业的特殊性而设计的,那么你可能正站在人工智能受益的一方。

Alison Mass:欢迎收听高盛播客《Great Investors》。我是Alison Mass。我即将与Dipan Patel坐下来交谈,他是Permira的联席管理合伙人和联席首席执行官,Permira是一家全球投资公司,业务涵盖私募股权和信贷,管理着约$100亿美元的资产。

欢迎来到《Great Investors》。非常高兴你能来这里。

Alison Mass:那么,每个人都记得自己的第一份工作,但你的第一份工作肯定格外难忘。你在2002,年的安达信工作,大学毕业后去了雷曼兄弟。

那一定是令人着迷的经历。那么,请跟我们谈谈这些经历。

Dipan Patel:是的,没错。我在2002年安然丑闻期间在安达信工作,之后在2008,年全球金融危机期间在雷曼兄弟工作。

在30岁之前亲眼目睹两家标志性公司挣扎并最终倒闭,这对我来说是形成性的经历。一旦你见过,就很难忘记。

Dipan Patel:这留下了持久的记忆和许多教训。

Alison Mass:给我们讲讲今天的Permira吧。对于那些不太熟悉的人,Permira的独特之处是什么?也许可以结合你职业生涯早期学到的一些教训,谈谈这些教训如何帮助你今天领导Permira。

Dipan Patel:所以,Permira始于1985年,当时只有四个人和来自施罗德的$48百万资金。在过去41年里,如果快进到现在,这家公司已经筹集了超过$100亿的资金。

我们大约有500名员工、250名投资者,并在全球设有16个办事处。我们投资于私募股权和信贷。我们的私募股权业务主要在四个行业进行投资:消费、医疗、服务和科技。它主要聚焦于中端市场,因此可以想象那些范围在$200百万企业价值到$2亿企业价值之间的企业。

我们做的一切都是重要的少数股权投资,即带有实际权力的治理,一直到完全控制。我们是非常活跃的所有者。然后,我们的信贷业务在私人信贷到流动信贷的风险回报谱系中进行投资。你问到了什么使我们独特以及我们的优势所在。

我想说这有几个不同的方面。第一,Permira在1990年代末筹集了第一只泛欧基金,因此我们在欧洲各地建立了本地团队,以及密集的网络、关系和足迹,这给我们带来了很好的效果。

这是我们今日投资中的约50%。与此同时,我们可能是极少数对美国和欧洲业务配置同等权重的公司之一。我们约有50%的员工在美国,50%在欧洲,50%的已部署资本和资本回报来自这两个地区。

所以这是其一。我们拥有所谓的数字核心多行业策略,我们在数字领域非常深入。但我们投资中最有趣的方面始终是数字与实体经济行业(如消费医疗和服务)的交汇点。

这正是我们特别有优势的地方。比如一个实体经济企业,其价值创造在很大程度上依赖于数字领域,这正是Permira的强项。我们拥有非常强的成长基因,因此我们可能在私募股权大盘股领域拥有增长最快的投资组合之一。

我们的投资组合持续实现有机增长,营收增长率为低双位数,利润增长率显著更高,这是我们的设计使然。我们超配更具成长性的企业。典型的Permira投资对象往往杠杆率偏低、利润率偏低、但增长率偏高,我们非常喜欢这种模式。

最终,当你出售企业时,特别是将企业出售给战略买家,你需要让对方相信企业有长期增长潜力。而你不能通过在投资期间对业务投资不足、压榨业务来实现这一点。因此,我们往往在新产品、新渠道和新地域上进行非常深入的投资。

我们经常推动业务模式转型,但增长承销是我们投资委员会审核的任何事项的核心。最后,我们是一家私有公司。这并非独一无二,有许多规模化的私募股权基金,但随着时间的推移,这一点变得越来越重要。

自成立以来我们一直是私有合伙制,这一直没有改变。我们由合伙人所有,这最终关系到结果、业绩、激励和一致性。

Alison Mass:保持私有且不上市,在哪些方面有助于您的投资文化,以及留住和吸引人才?

Dipan Patel:Permira是由投资者为投资者建立的,因此我们想要并吸引那些工匠型人才,对吧?我认为行业正在分化为两种模式:一种是工厂模式,另一种是手工艺模式。

Dipan Patel:是的,这两种模式没有对错之分,都能成功,但它们确实不同,吸引不同类型的人。如果你喜欢精心打磨投资论点,独立思考,处理交易,适应非常长的酝酿期,希望成为自己领域的绝对专家;坦白说,如果你不喜欢频繁交易,也不想只是按部就班地配置资产,那么Permira就是你的理想之地。如果你想开发新产品、新渠道和新业务线,可能其他公司更适合你。但Permira是工匠的用武之地。

Alison Mass:是的,这是很好的描述。感谢你的分享。你自2009起就加入Permira了。

在你职业生涯早期,有没有哪笔交易让你特别自豪?

Dipan Patel:我们曾在美国将一家名为Renaissance Learning的公司私有化。

那是一家教育科技公司。它被销售到了 70,000 所学校。最终在两年半内将其出售。我们赚取了超过四倍的回报。我们与那家公司做了很多事情,我有幸参与其中。

对我来说,它之所以特别,是因为当我加入公司时,我认为这很好地说明了我们公司的特点,而且我认为我们经常对初级人才这样做,我们确实鼓励人们从进入公司的职业生涯一开始就进行主题驱动的研究工作。

我离开去开始研究教育科技领域的一个主题。我记得提出了一个名为“全球前 10 家公司”的想法,我认为这些公司会很有趣。

Dipan Patel:Renaissance Learning 就在那前 10 名单上。而且,你知道,我当时对这个行业相对陌生,我去找了我当时的主管,他现在实际上是公司的合伙人,并说:“看,我一直在做这项工作,你觉得怎么样?”

实际上,有趣的是,我联系了一位名叫 Barry O'Brien 的人——

Dipan Patel:我想他当时可能是高盛的副总裁。

Alison Mass:是的,他现在负责我们全球的 TMT 业务。

Dipan Patel:他让我联系了拥有该公司的 Terry 和 Judi Paul。我对那里的人说:“嗯,我应该直接去吗?”他们说:“当然,直接去吧。”我是公司的副总裁,他们说:“直接给西海岸的这个人打电话”,因为这是美国的事情。

所以我给一个叫 Brian Ruder 的人打了电话,我们一起去参加了会议。那是在丹佛。事情接踵而至,我们最终推动了那笔交易,并将那家公司私有化。对我来说,最棒的是——而且我经常想到我们组织中的初级人才——那个想法来自一个初级人员。

这也得益于那个初级人员被鼓励将想法尽可能地推进。那对我来说很吸引人,因为我们对那项业务所做的事情,我们关闭了一个硬件部门,将整个商业模式过渡到 SaaS,进入一个新的国家,投资于这个全新的数学产品。

我们在大约三年的时间里完成了这一切,并因此得到了回报,所以那是一个美好事物的缩影。我被宠坏了,因为我在那之后可能会想——

Dipan Patel:“这就是私募股权的运作方式。”对吧?所以,是的,那笔投资在我心中占有特殊的位置。

Alison Mass:是的。我喜欢这个故事,它是从一个给高盛的电话开始的。

Alison Mass:我得把这个告诉 Barry 和 Brian,Brian 的第一笔交易。现在你和 Brian 共同执掌 Permira 的最高职位。这是怎么发生的,你们如何分配职责,或者如何看待共同管理合伙人?

Dipan Patel:是的,Brian 和我已经一起工作很长时间了。所以,实际上,在我们一起完成 Renaissance Learning 的交易后,Brian 在某个时候打电话给我说:“看看这家叫 Ancestry.com 的公司。”

长话短说,我们将该公司私有化,在该投资上赚取了近四倍的回报,在这过程中他说:“你为什么不来西海岸呢?”,所以我搬到了西海岸,我在——

Dipan Patel:我在我们的 Menlo Park 办公室工作,现在那里有 40 人,而且那……

但在当时我们只有四五个人。所以我在那里认识了 Brian,我们一起合作了无数笔交易,你知道的,Ancestry 以及之后许多其他交易。所以我们有长期、非常长期的合作关系。Permira 在其 41 年的历史中经历了五次领导层交接,共同的主题始终是两位联席管理合伙人或新的联席管理合伙人由内部晋升,而现有领导层或领导者在组织中留任数年并保持非常活跃。因此,在领导层交接的运作方式上,这一点一直非常一致。

Brian 和我,如我所说,我们共事已久,他在美国,我在欧洲,我们都在科技领域成长,但他曾共同负责科技业务,而我则转而共同负责消费团队,这是我们最大的两个行业,我们倾向于采用共同领导模式,我们喜欢那种模式。我认为高盛也有—

Dipan Patel:在你们的行业和地区也有相当多的共同领导。几年前,当 Kurt 升任执行董事长,Tom 离开公司时,这是一个自然的演变。我想说的是,最重要的是,当然 Brian 和我,我们有分工,显然是在地域、行业等方面。最重要的是,我们每年做出八到十个非常重要的投资决策。

我们每年大约做出八到十个非常重要的退出决策。不太重要的是我们如何划分组织的这个那个,更重要的是我们如何汇聚在一起,投资委员会如何尽可能多地做出世界级的决策。

正如我之前所说,我们是一家私人公司,我们的多数经济利益与我们推动的结果挂钩,而这些决策是我们每年做的最重要的事情。如果我们做对了,我们可能在其他很多事情上犯错。如果我们做错了,那么无论我们做对多少其他事情,都弥补不了。

Alison Mass:听起来像是一个很棒的合作伙伴关系,而且是一个长期的—

Alison Mass:合作伙伴关系。那么,正如你提到的,Permira 早已在科技、消费、服务和医疗保健领域建立了专门的行业团队,这远早于私募股权领域的标准做法。那么 AI 如何影响这种考量?有一种看法认为,许多私募股权支持的公司可能会被 AI 颠覆。那么你们在投资委员会流程中如何考虑这一点?

Dipan Patel:所以,好事发生在好公司身上,坏事发生在坏公司身上。我们认为好公司是那些拥有强大护城河的公司。

而坏公司是那些缺乏护城河的公司,显然这是一个频谱。我认为 AI 所做的只是加速这些事情。所以,如果你的业务是聚合大宗商品数据,通过大宗商品渠道和大众化用户体验销售,你可能已经处于下滑曲线上,而 AI 将加速这一点。

而如果你是一家拥有专有数据和网络效应、极其强大品牌的公司,并且你构建了一个针对特定垂直领域特性而设计的用户体验,那么你很可能站在 AI 的正确一边,你可能无论如何都在成功,而 AI 将允许你在已有基础上增加一个智能层,然后将其变现。

私募股权行业可能同时存在好公司和坏公司。我认为我们公司考虑的一个指标是我们的净资产价值中有多少是……或者说,当Dario开口说话时,或者当Anthropic发布新模型时,我们是否会感到高兴?说实话,这个数字,我们大概在两三年前还在摸索,当时可能处于防御状态。今天,我们在这一点上肯定处于进攻状态,而且这个指标只会不断上升。但如果我看整个私募股权行业,我不知道具体数据,但现实是参差不齐的。

当然,私募股权行业中有100%的净资产价值并没有站在AI的正确一边,也没有从每次新模型发布中受益。

Alison Mass:那么,现在是否有特定的行业或子行业是你希望部署资本的?

Dipan Patel:是的。首先,退一步看,这是一个令人着迷的时代,同时也是一个压力重重、有时令人困惑的时代。我始终喜欢麦肯锡的类比:你一手拿着显微镜,另一手拿着望远镜。当你用显微镜看时,问题清单或担忧之墙是无穷无尽的,对吧?

政府债务、潜在的加息、当今世界比二战以来任何时候都多的武装冲突、AI带来的失业威胁,我可以一直列下去。与此同时,你有一个重大的平台转变,现在还处于非常早期的阶段,它将重塑行业和利润池。

能源转型方面,电力需求将在一段时间内翻倍,同时,一半的电网容量需要退役;医疗领域有重大进步;印度这个国家将崛起,并在未来20年内推动非常显著的增长。

所以你同时手里拿着这两样东西,我认为作为领导者,你必须对近处的事物采取远距离视角,对远处的事物采取近距离视角。这就是我们试图在组织内做到的,真正从长远考虑,思考我们的退出环境,努力滑向冰球将要去的地方,而不是它现在所在的地方。

所有这些事情,以及那些大的、我们称之为望远镜级别的事情,我认为它们会以不同方式通过我们的行业体现出来。在软件领域,将会是增加智能层并随时间变现。在服务领域,工程服务和蓝领服务中会有令人着迷的事情可做。

在消费领域,我认为AI将彻底改变个性化,这将完全改变公司与消费者沟通的方式以及他们如何进入消费者的钱包。医疗保健——已知疾病大约有10,000种,但针对这些疾病的目标药物只有600种左右。

随着时间的推移,这些领域将取得重大进展。所以我们喜欢我们的押注。我们喜欢我们投资的地方,我们将通过我们的行业以不同方式表达这些大的望远镜级别的事情。但我们始终发现,关键是你必须站在这些大的结构性趋势的正确一边,即使这意味着付出更多、付得更高,并在付出时感到不舒服。

从长远来看,回到我之前所说的,好事发生在好公司身上,当你站在结构性趋势的正确一边时,你往往更容易遇到好运;而当你与这些趋势对抗时,则往往厄运连连。

Alison Mass:是的,这是一个很有见地的分析方式。你提到你和Brian每年大部分时间都专注于最重要的投资决策,以及撤资和变现。那么,关于私募股权中广为讨论的流动性问题和退出积压问题,你是怎么看的?你在如何管理Permira应对这些问题?

Dipan Patel:你看,这个行业和这种模式,只有在每年约有20%到25%的DPI(投入资本分红倍数)时才真正可行。而行业并没有实现这一点,而且这种状况已经持续了将近几年了,对吧?我认为这个数字大概是10%左右。

如果商业模式要运作并蓬勃发展,这种情况就不能持续。所以首先,是的,我认为这是有问题的。我们各自在过去12个月里取得了我们的数据,我们的数字是22%,所以我们在过去12个月里实现了_NAV的22%(即把22%的NAV变现),我们是通过多种不同的退出途径实现的。

这并不容易,但这需要你和你的组织有一种心态,即DPI是一种运营节奏,而不是一个事件。坦率地说,这对人们来说可能不太舒服,但事实是,在你把钱返还给投资者的那一刻起,那已经成为历史。

Dipan Patel:对吧?你需要专注于接下来要变现和推向市场的下一批项目。

我们有一个集中的目标设定系统。我们有一个退出委员会,在整个组织中推动很大的问责制。我们设定与实现这些目标挂钩的激励机制,但最重要的一点其实就是拥有好的公司。

这是老生常谈,说起来容易,但好公司会自我销售,而坏公司只会陷入困境。过去12个月,实际上如果你追溯到更早,是过去24个月,我们之所以有超额流动性,最重要的原因其实不是我们的流程、激励机制和系统。

实际上是因为我们拥有的业务是令人向往的。它们是人们想要拥有的业务,而人们想要拥有它们的原因是它们在退出时有很长的增长跑道。它们不是过度优化的业务。

Alison Mass:对于我们的观众,你能解释一下什么是DPI吗?它代表什么?

Dipan Patel:是这样的,你知道,DPI其实就是返还给投资者的资金。我认为这是最简单的描述方式。当我们谈论NAV的百分比时,那是你的未实现净资产价值的百分比,而我们倾向于以及行业倾向于看待它的方式是,你返还的资金占你持有的未实现净资产价值的百分比是多少?这个指标应该达到20到25%。

Alison Mass:明白了。谢谢你的澄清。每家投资公司都在谈论文化。但文化通常是在压力时期锻造和建立的。

Alison Mass:那么,Permira的文化在过去几个市场周期中是如何演变的,它今天如何指导你的决策?

Dipan Patel:雷曼兄弟和安达信,两家不同的公司,两个不同的时期,两个不同的因素,两个不同的面孔,都处于这些组织的顶端。

在我看来,这些组织的共同主题,我认为,正是导致它们各自取得非凡成功的原因,同样也导致了它们最终的垮台。以安达信为例,他们建立了一个非常强大的业务,将咨询服务交叉销售给审计客户,然后这让他们在安然事件中栽了跟头,因为他们把这一做法推得太远了。

雷曼,你知道,雷曼不是一家银行,它是一家经纪交易商。它短期借款,然后非常激进地投资于另一端。这在几十年的时间里带来了巨大的成功,直到不再成功。

Dipan Patel:然后你问自己的问题是,为什么,为什么会被允许发生?至少在我看来,这是因为……它们都是文化在规模上失灵的典型案例。我认为如果你在那些公司里走一走,我当时在那些公司都是非常初级的员工,所以我远远没有接近最高决策层。

但你在组织中会有一种感觉。无论你处于什么级别。我认为那些组织的共同主题可能是,你有魅力型领导,你有非常远大的增长抱负,你有大量的信心,你可能还有过度冒险的文化。

那些已经被正常化的危险做法。你可能还有无法向权力说真话的人,你的激励机制用错了地方,这些在那些公司中都是普遍存在的。

Alison Mass:是的。这些都是很危险的东西。

Dipan Patel:没错。你知道,因为你在高盛建立了一个了不起的业务,会有一系列因素促成了那种成功,并继续推动公司向前发展。

但如果文化不欢迎思想的多样性、向权力说真话、以及实际进行风险管理的结构,那么任何公司,包括高盛,迟早都会遇到同样的问题。所以那种文化基础和有边界的创业精神非常重要。

所以,我想现在回到你关于Permira和文化的问题,我认为,你知道,你向前生活,向后理解。我在安达信或雷曼兄弟期间当然没有记笔记。但通过潜移默化,我认为那些东西会影响我思考文化的方式。

Permira是一个组织,我最喜欢它的一点是,它能在压力中变得更好,所以我一直喜欢《反脆弱》这本书,纳西姆·塔勒布写的。这是一本有点复杂的书,但我认为核心思想很简单,那就是有些系统是强健的,它们往往能经受危机和压力,而有些系统是反脆弱的,它们能在危机和压力中变得更好。

而Permira毫无疑问,在最高压力时刻中变得更好,而且更快地变得更好。我可以列出过去40多年里的一系列这样的时刻。我认为最可能让我看到,并且我亲身经历过的,也是我们历史中非常重要的一部分的,显然就是全球金融危机。

那时我们有一只基金,里面满是企业,实际上是相当不错的企业,但具有周期性。太多的周期性,太多的杠杆,在周期中错误的时机我们投资得太快,当周期转向时,你知道,我们……当我加入Permira时,我记得坐在……

实际上,是Tom放了一张幻灯片,他把基金标记了出来,我以为那是个笔误。

你知道,我们的组织没有失去任何人。投资者和合伙人都自掏腰包,因为我们在下一个基金周期遭遇了所谓的估值下调。

我们握有企业的关键控制权,在正确的时机变现,我们在这个基金的其余部分做了一些很棒的投资。实际上,像Renaissance Learning和Ancestry也是那个基金的一部分。最终,那只基金成为了顶级四分位基金。

Alison Mass: 哇,那真是太棒了。太好了。

Dipan Patel: 我们从中变得更好了。同时,我们当时也将策略转向了更高质量的企业,强调韧性和结构性增长。这就是我们今天通过各个行业领域执行的核心策略。

所以,对我来说,文化——这也是我最关注的事情——可能包括两个方面。第一,不要重蹈雷曼或安达信的覆辙,对吧?因此,要有信心知道自己在做什么,做好它,并不断深入。

同时,始终从第一性原理出发重新评估,无论你正在做的事情是否正确,一方面要确保我们有一个组织,不仅能够承受压力,而且能在困境中变得更好。

Alison Mass: 是的。这就像是带着谦逊的自信。

Alison Mass: 这种文化也体现在你的投资组合之外,Permira通过其基金会做出了重大的慈善承诺。这个倡议是如何开始的?为什么今天对这家公司如此重要?

Dipan Patel: 我们在10年前成立了Permira基金会。今天,我们支持约35个组织,我们组织中有80%名的专业人士已经或正在为这些组织贡献大量公益时间。所以,这对我们来说在文化上非常重要。我们今年刚刚决定让基金会成为我们基金中的永久附带权益持有人。

Dipan Patel: 因此,我们认为我们是少数几家——也许是我所知的唯一一家——这样做的公司。对我们来说,去和我们的合伙人说要让这个基金会永久性地与我们推动的结果保持一致,是一个相当大的请求。

所以,你知道,这很重要。谢谢你问起这个,因为我们很少谈及它,但它在我们的组织内部很重要。我们在内部确实会讨论,但通常只在公司内部谈论。

Alison Mass: 是的。嗯,你展现了很多行业领导力。我还没听说过有谁把附带权益放进基金会。这太棒了。那么,你和Brian是新一代私募股权领导者的一部分。

Alison Mass: 从整个行业更广泛来看,你认为你们这一代领导者将在未来十年把私募股权带向何方?

Dipan Patel: 这是个好问题。你看,这个行业正在分化,对吧?这不是秘密。两种非常不同的商业模式正在出现。有些人通常非常专注,非常狭窄且深入于他们所做的,他们的成败取决于他们是否表现良好。

这种模式有利有弊。还有一些公司通过不断拓展新的业务线来扩大规模,产品广度对这些公司来说非常重要。零售渠道对这些公司非常关键,但这涉及另一套考量。

我无法兼顾两者。我只能谈谈我们正在做的事情,以及可能这个地区的新一代领导层在思考的问题。我真正感到兴奋的是一件非常简单的事情:建立一个具有独特投资文化的组织。

这种文化会吸引那些想成为工匠、希望长期持续创造卓越业绩的人才。这绝非易事。这非常困难,要求你对业务的每一个环节都保持持续的不满,不断翻找问题,问自己为什么不能做得更好,推动进步,投资并着眼于长远。

要愿意滑向冰球将要到达的位置,而不是它现在的位置。这些话说起来容易,但做起来很难,而且需要每天强迫自己去做。但我已经在这家公司工作了17年,我希望还能再工作17年。我知道Brian也有同样的感受,这就是我们最热心去做的事情。

那么,从个人层面来说,你成长于一个移民家庭,看着父亲白手起家扩展事业。

Alison Mass:这种第一手的创业经历如何塑造了你的世界观,以及如今你支持创始人的方式?

Dipan Patel:我父亲大约在-20多岁时来到这个国家。简而言之,他开了一家店,后来扩展到大约60家店,而且都位于伦敦的黄金地段。那些是杂货店。

期间,他做了一笔很小的P2P交易(公众转私人),后来把生意卖给了Tesco(乐购)。那是在2000,年。之后,他又创建了另一家公司,经营了大约20年后卖给了Apax France,作为他们当时进行的整合项目。

现在他已经75岁了,还在寻找下一个机会。我想我从小就比较懂世故,可能是从底层看到这些事情的缘故。我还对创始人产生了一种同理心。

我不是创始人,实际上我父亲总是这样告诉我。我永远不会真正理解,晚上睡觉时肩上背负着一个组织意味着什么。我认为那完全是另一回事。

但是那种坚毅,纯粹的工作热情,仅仅是看着那种精神就让我受益匪浅。那种冒险精神、对风险的权衡、伴随而来的自信和偏执,都深深印在我的脑海里。

Alison Mass:完全同意。真是令人印象深刻的创业背景。

Alison Mass:太棒了。我想以快速问答环节来结束这些谈话。

Alison Mass:问你几个简短回答的问题。作为投资者,你认为你个人最大的优势是什么?

Dipan Patel:我会说是了解自己不知道什么,以及知道从哪里获取这些信息。

Alison Mass:好的。你做的第一笔投资是什么?

Dipan Patel:那其实是在Renaissance Learning之前。在我最初加入的另一家私募股权公司,有一家名为Sagem的公司,那是从西门子分拆出来的业务。

Alison Mass:你收到过的最好的建议是什么?

迪潘·帕特尔:我想在投资领域,可能我总会想到霍华德,我想应该是霍华德·马克斯的那句话:“投资中最危险的四个字是‘这次不一样。’”

艾莉森·马斯:我们之前和你的投资委员会谈过这一点。工作之余,你通常如何安排时间?

迪潘·帕特尔:我有三个孩子,9,、11,和13,,你知道,我的意思是,这份工作是一周七天,而且非常紧张。所以几乎所有时间我都尽量和妻子、孩子们待在一起。

那是第一要务。如果不在做那个,我热爱体育。我热爱现场体育。我是利物浦的季票持有者。我走遍国家乃至世界各地去追随球队,如果我不和家人在一起,你最有可能会在安菲尔德找到我。

迪潘·帕特尔:我想可能克里斯·霍恩是因为他的思维方式。巴菲特则是因为他的性情。可能还有芒格,同样出色,以及霍华德·马克斯在风险管理方面。所以是的,我会说是那些经典大师。

艾莉森·马斯:是的。嗯,真是令人钦佩的投资者。最后,目前世界上什么最让你感到兴奋?

迪潘·帕特尔:一切。我们谈到的每件事。生活在一个伟大的时代。

艾莉森·马斯:是的。总之,迪潘,非常感谢你加入我们。谢谢。这是一次很棒的对话。

艾莉森·马斯:感谢各位收听本期高盛交易所播客的“伟大投资者”节目,本期节目录制于28月2026日。我是艾莉森·马斯。如果你喜欢这期节目,我们希望你能在Apple Podcasts、Spotify、YouTube或任何你收听播客的平台关注我们,并给我们留下评分和评论。

完整英文原文

Dipan Patel, co-CEO of Permira, joins Goldman Sachs Exchanges: Great Investors to discuss how Permira’s sector-specialized investment approach and private partnership structure differs from firms which have grown through platform scale and breadth. He also discusses Permira’s strategy for transforming portfolio companies and what has made those assets attractive to strategic buyers, and he shares how Permira assesses technology risk in its portfolio.

Dipan Patel: Good things happen to good companies, and bad things happen to bad companies. I think what AI is doing is just accelerating those things. So if you're a business that aggregates commodity data, sells it through a commodity channel with a commodity UX, you are probably already on a decline curve and if you're a company with proprietary data and with network effects, an incredibly strong brand, and you've built a user experience which is built for the idiosyncrasies of a vertical probably you're going to be on the right side of AI”.

Alison Mass: Welcome to Goldman Sachs Exchanges: Great Investors. I'm Alison Mass. I'm about to sit down with Dipan Patel, Co-Managing Partner and Co-CEO of Permira, a global investment firm spanning private equity and credit, with approximately $100 billion in assets under management.

So welcome to Great Investors. It’s so great to have you here.

Alison Mass: So, everyone remembers their first job, but yours must have been especially memorable. You worked at Arthur Andersen in 2002, and then after university you went to Lehman Brothers.

Those must have been fascinating experiences. So, tell us a little bit about them.

Dipan Patel: Yeah, that’s right. I worked at Arthur Andersen in 2002 during the Enron scandal, and then Lehman Brothers in 2008, obviously during the global financial crisis.

Formative to see two iconic companies struggle and eventually fall before I was 30. Once you see it, it’s hard to unsee it.

Dipan Patel: It leaves lasting memories and a lot of learnings.

Alison Mass: Tell us about Permira today. For those who aren’t familiar, what makes Permira unique? And maybe tie in some of the lessons that you learned from earlier in your career that have helped you lead Permira today.

Dipan Patel: So, Permira started in 1985 as four people and $48 million from Schroders Bank. Over the last 41 years, if you wind the clock forward, the business has raised more than $100 billion of capital.

We have about 500 people, 250 investors, and 16 offices globally. We invest in private equity and in credit. Our private equity business invests really across four sectors: consumer, healthcare, services, and technology. It does this primarily across the mid-market, so think businesses in the kind of $200 million EV to $2 billion EV range.

And everything we do is really significant minority so governance with teeth, all the way through to full control. We are very active owners. Then our credit business invests across private credit through to liquid credit and right through the risk-return spectrum. You asked a question around what makes us unique and what’s our edge.

I'd say it is a few different things. The first thing is Permira raised the first Pan-European fund in late 1990s and as a result, we built boots on the ground right across Europe and just dense networks, relationships, footprints, and that's served us really well.

That's 50% of our investing today. At the same time, we're probably one of the very few firms that have an equal weight to the US and European business. About 50% of our people sit in the US, 50% are in Europe, 50% of our capital deployed and capital return have come from both regions.

So that's one. We have what we call digital core multi-sector, so we're very deep in digital. But the most interesting aspect of our investing has always been at the intersection of digital and our real economy sectors, so consumer healthcare and services.

And that's where we have a particular edge. Like a real economy business where there is a significant value creation underwrite in the realm of digital is power alley for Permira. We have a very strong growth DNA, so we've probably got one of the fastest-growing portfolios in the larger cap end of PE.

Our portfolio consistently grows organically low teens top line and significantly higher at the bottom line that's by design. We over-index to growthier businesses. The typical Permira business will be under-levered, under-margined and over-growthed, and we really like that formula.

In the end, when you're selling businesses, particularly selling businesses to strategics, you are trying to convince someone that there is a long growth runway, and you don't get there by under-investing in a business and milking a business over your investment period. So, we tend to invest really deeply in new products, new channels, new geographies.

We often do business model transitions, but growth underwrites are central to anything that comes through our investment committee. And then the last thing is, we are a private company. It's not unique there are a bunch of scaled private equity funds, but it's increasingly becoming important over time.

And we're a private partnership since inception, that's not changed. We're owned by our partners, and that goes ultimately to outcomes and performance and incentives and alignment.

Alison Mass: In what ways does being private and remaining private help with your investment culture and with retaining talent and recruiting talent?

Dipan Patel: So Permira is built by investors for investors, and so we want and attract people who are craftspeople, right? So, I think the industry is bifurcating between more, like, factory models and artisanal models.

Dipan Patel: Yeah, there's no right or wrong in these models and both these models will work, but they are definitely different, and they attract different types of people. And if you're someone who likes to craft an investment thesis, think differently, work a deal, is comfortable with really long gestation periods, wants to be an absolute expert in their space; is frankly comfortable not doing deals and being in the cadence of just allocating assets, Permira's going to be the place for you. And if you want to build new products and new channels and new business lines. There will be other firms that are better homes for those people. But Permira's a craftsman's place of work.

Alison Mass: Yeah. That's a great way to describe it. So thank you for that. So you've been at Permira since 2009.

Was there any particular deal from early in your career that you're especially proud of?

Dipan Patel: We did a deal taking a company called Renaissance Learning private in the US.

It was an ed-tech company. It was sold into 70,000 schools. And ended up selling it in two and a half years. We made more than four times the money. Did a range of things with that company, and I was fortunate to be involved in it.

The reason why it's special for me was. And I think actually says a lot about our firm when I joined, and I think we do this a lot with our junior talent, we really encourage thematic thesis-driven work from right at the beginning of people's career journeys in the firm.

And I went off and I started working on a thematic piece in ed-tech. I remember coming up with something called the global top 10 these companies that I thought would be interesting.

Dipan Patel: Renaissance Learning was on that top 10. And, you know, I was relatively new to the industry and I went to my principal at that time, who now actually is a partner in the firm, and said, "Look, I've been doing this work, and what do you think?"

And actually, funny thing I'd reached out to a guy called Barry O'Brien-

Dipan Patel: Who was I think then probably a VP at Goldman Sachs.

Alison Mass: Yes, who now runs our TMT business globally.

Dipan Patel: And he put me in touch with Terry and Judi Paul, who owned the company. And I said to the guys there, "Well, should I just go?" And they said, "Sure, just go." And I was an associate in the firm, and they said, "Just call this guy on the West Coast” cause it's a US thing.

And so I called a guy called Brian Ruder, and we went along to the meeting. It was in Denver. And one thing led to another, and we ended up prosecuting that deal and taking that company private. And the great thing about it for me was, and I think about it a lot with the junior talent we have in the organization, is that idea came from a junior person.

It also came because that junior person was encouraged to go take that thread as far as they possibly could. It was fascinating for me because the things we did with that business, we shut down a hardware division, we transitioned the whole business model to SaaS, we entered a new country, we invested in this whole new math product.

We did that all in the course of about three years and got rewarded for all of it so it was a vignette of good stuff. I got spoiled because I probably ended that and thought-

Dipan Patel: “This is how private equity works." Right? And so yeah, special place in my heart that investment.

Alison Mass: Yeah. I love the story, how it originates with a call to Goldman Sachs.

Alison Mass: I'm going to have to tell Barry that and Brian, the first deal with Brian. So now you share the top job at Permira with Brian. How did that come about, and how do you split up responsibilities or look at being co-managing partners?

Dipan Patel: Yeah, so Brian and I have worked together for a long time. So actually, after we did Renaissance Learning together Brian called me some point and said, "Take a look at this business called Ancestry.com."

And long story short, we took that company private, made nearly four times the money on that investment, and in the middle of that he said, "Why don't you come out to the West Coast?", so I moved out to the West Coast, and I worked in-

Dipan Patel: And I was in our Menlo Park office which is now 40 people and that...

But at that time it was four or five of us. And so I got to know Brian there, and we worked together on lots and lots of deals you know, Ancestry and then many other deals together after that. So we had a long, very long working relationship. Permira's done five leadership transitions in its 41-year history, the common themes have always been the two co-managing partners or the new co-managing partner has been an internal promote and the existing leadership or leader has stayed in the organization for a handful of years and been very active. So that's been very consistent in terms of the way that this leadership transition has worked.

Brian and I, as I said, we've worked together for a long time he's based in the US, I'm based in Europe, and we both grew up in tech, but he co-ran tech I went on to co-run the consumer team, so that's two of our biggest sectors and we tend to have a co-leadership model we like that model. I think Goldman Sachs has a-

Dipan Patel: Fair amount of co-leadership in your sectors and geographies too. It was a natural evolution a couple of years ago when Kurt moved up to Executive Chairman, and Tom had left the business. I would say the most important thing, and of course Brian and I, we have our splits and obviously across geography and sectors and things like that. The most important thing is we make eight to ten really important investing decisions every year.

We make about eight to ten really important exit decisions every year. And less important is how we split the this and the that of the organization, and more important is how we come together, and the investment committee comes together to make just as many world-class decisions as we possibly can.

As I said earlier, we're a private company, and most of our economics are tied up in the outcomes that we drive, and those decisions are the most important things we do every single year. And if we get them right, we can get a lot of other things wrong. And if we get them wrong, there's any number of things we can get right, and it won't make up for it.

Alison Mass: Sounds like a great partnership, and a long-standing-

Alison Mass: Partnership. So as you mentioned, Permira has built dedicated sector teams in tech, in consumer, services, and healthcare, long before that was standard practice in private equity. So how does AI affect that calculus? There is a perception that a lot of private equity-backed companies stand to be disrupted by AI. So how do you take that into account in your investment committee processes?

Dipan Patel: So, good things happen to good companies, and bad things happen to bad companies. And we think of good companies as companies with strong moats.

And bad companies as companies that lack moats, and obviously that's a spectrum. I think what AI is doing is just accelerating those things. So, if you're a business that aggregates commodity data, sells it through a commodity channel with a commodity UX, you are probably already on a decline curve, and AI is going to accelerate that.

And if you're a company with proprietary data and with network effects, an incredibly strong brand, and you've built a user experience which is built for the idiosyncrasies of a vertical probably you're going to be on the right side of AI, and you are probably succeeding anyway, and AI is going to allow you to add an intelligence layer on top of what you already have and then monetize that.

The private equity industry probably has got a mixture of good and bad companies. And I think the metric that we think about in our firm is how much of our NAV is ... Or, or do we feel happy about when Dario opens his mouth. Or when Anthropic drops a model? And honestly, that number was, we were figuring that out probably two, three years ago and were probably on the defense. Today we're definitely on the offense on that, and that metric is only going up and to the right. But if I look out across the entire private equity industry, and I don't know the stats, but the reality is there is a mixture.

And for sure 100% of the NAV sitting in the private equity industry is not on the right side of AI and is not benefiting every time a new model is released.

Alison Mass: So are there specific sectors or sub-sectors where you're looking to deploy capital now?

Dipan Patel: Yup. So first of all, just zooming back it's a fascinating time to be alive it's also very stressful and sometimes confusing time to be alive. And I always like the McKinsey analogy of you know, you've got the microscope in one hand, and you've got the telescope in the other. And when you look down the microscope, the list of problems or the wall of worry is endless, right?

You have government indebtedness, you have potential rate hikes, you have more armed conflicts in the world today than any time since Second World War, you have the threat of unemployment from AI, and I could go on and on and on. At the same time, you've got a major platform shift which is super early innings, and it's going to reshape industries and reshape profit pools.

You have energy transition where power demand is going to double over some period of time, and at the same time, half of the grid capacity is going to need to be retired, you have major advances in the medical field, you have a country in India which is going to come online and drive very significant growth over the next 20 years.

So you've got these kind of two things in your hand at the same time, and I think as a leader you've got to take a distanced view of the stuff that's close up and a close view of the stuff that's far away. And that's what we try and do in the organization and just think really long term and think about our exit environment and try and skate to where the puck's going rather than where the puck is.

All of those things and those big, let's call it telescope things, they'll be expressed through our sectors I think in different ways. I think within software, it's going to be about adding an intelligence layer and monetizing that over time. I think within services there will be fascinating things to do in engineering services, in blue-collar services.

In consumer, I think AI's going to radically transform personalization that will completely change and change the way that companies speak to consumers and how they get into consumers' wallets. Healthcare — there’s something like 10,000 known diseases and only 600-ish target medicines target drugs for those.

There will be major advances in those fields over time. So we like our bets. We like where we invest, and we will express these big telescope-type things through our sectors in different ways. But we've always found the key thing is you have to be on the right side of these big structural trends even if it means paying up and paying more and feeling uncomfortable when you pay up.

Like, over the long term, back to what I said around good things happen to good companies, you just tend to expose yourself to good luck when you're on the right side of these structural trends, and you tend to be inundated with bad luck when you fight those things.

Alison Mass: Yep. That was a thoughtful way to analyze it. So, you mentioned that you and Brian spend most of your time focusing on the most important investment decisions that you're going to make each year, and the divestitures, the monetization. So can... What about the much-talked-about issue of liquidity in private equity and the exit backlog that we all talk about. How do you see it, and how are you managing Permira through that?

Dipan Patel: So look, the industry and the model, it only really works if there's about 20% to 25% DPI per ann. And the industry's not been delivering that, and it's not been delivering that for coming up to a handful of years now, right? I think that stat's probably 10-ish percent.

And that can't continue if the business model is to work and flourish. So first of all, yes, I think it's problematic. We each take our data points in the last 12 months, our stat is 22% so we've realized 22% of our NAV over the last 12 months, and we've done that through a variety of different exit routes.

It's not easy but it requires you and your organization to have the mindset that DPI is an operating rhythm. It's not an event. And frankly, and it's uncomfortable for people, but the truth is, it's ancient history the second you send the money back.

Dipan Patel: Right? And you need to be focused on the next set of things that you're going to be monetizing and bringing to market.

We have a centralized target-setting system. We have an exit committee we drive really big accountability down the organization. We set incentives that are linked to achieving those things but the single most important thing really is just having good companies.

It's cliché, and it's easy to say, but good companies sell themselves, and bad companies just get stuck. And the single biggest reason why we've got excess liquidity over the last 12 months, the last 24 months actually if you go back, is actually not our processes and our incentives and our systems.

It's actually that we've got businesses that are desirable. They are businesses that people want to own, and the reason that they want to own them is they have very long growth runways at exit. They're not over-optimized businesses.

Alison Mass: For our viewers, can you discuss what DPI is? What does it stand for?

Dipan Patel: So, you know, DPI is really just money being sent back to investors. I think that's the easiest way to describe it. When we talk about percentage of NAV that's the percentage of your unrealized net asset value and the way that we tend to look at it, and I think the industry tends to look at it, is how much money are you sending back as a percentage of your unrealized net asset value that you're sitting on? And that metric ought to be at 20 to 25%.

Alison Mass: Got it. Thank you for clarifying. So every investment firm talks about culture. But culture is often forged and built during periods of stress.

Alison Mass: So how has Permira's culture evolved over past market cycles, and how does it guide your decision-making today?

Dipan Patel: So, Lehman Brothers and Arthur Andersen two different companies, two different times two different factors, two different faces at the top of those organizations.

The common theme in those organizations was, in my view, was the same thing that led to extraordinary success for each of them led to extraordinary downfall. So the case of Arthur Andersen, they had built a really strong business cross-selling consulting services into audit clients, and then that caught them out with Enron when they pushed that too far.

Lehman, you know, Lehman wasn't a bank, it was a broker-dealer. It was borrowing short, and it was investing that very aggressively on the other side. And that led to huge success over a couple of decades until it didn't.

Dipan Patel: And then the question you ask yourself is sort of why and why was that allowed to, to happen? And at least in my view, it was... they're both examples of just, like, culture failing at scale. And I think if you walked around both of those companies, and I was a very junior person in both of those companies at the time, so I was nowhere near the top table.

But there's a feeling you get being in organizations. Doesn't matter what level you are. And I think the common themes in those organizations was probably you had charismatic leadership, you had really big growth ambitions, you had a ton of confidence, you probably also had a culture of risk-taking that had gone too far.

Sort of risky practices that were, like, normalized. You had probably people that couldn't speak truth to power, you had incentives in the wrong place, and that would've been common between both of those companies.

Alison Mass: Yeah. Those are dangerous things to have.

Dipan Patel: Right. And you know, because you've built an amazing business in Goldman Sachs, there would've been a set of things that would've led to that success and continue to propel the company forward today.

But if the culture isn't one that welcomes diversity of thought, the speaking of truth to power, structures that actually risk manage, any company, including Goldman Sachs, will run into the same problem over time. So that kind of, like, cultural underpinning and bounded entrepreneurialism is really important.

So, I think that now coming back to your question around Permira and culture, I think that, you know, you sort of you live your life forward, you understand it backwards. And I certainly wasn't taking notes during Arthur Andersen or Lehman Brothers. But by osmosis, I think those things would've, you know, impacted the way I think about culture.

Permira is an organization and the number one thing I love about the organization is it gets better out of stress so I've always loved the book Antifragility, the Nassim Taleb book. And it's kind of a complicated book, but the core idea I think is quite simple, and it's that there are robust systems, and they tend to endure crisis and stress, and then there are anti-fragile systems that get better out of crisis and stress.

And Permira without question, has got better and much better, much faster out of peak stress moments. And I could go through a list of those moments over, you know, 40-plus years. I think the one that was most probably visible to me, and I lived through and is a huge part of our history, was obviously the global financial crisis.

We had a fund at that time which was full of businesses, actually pretty good businesses, but cyclical. Too, too much cyclicality, too much leverage at the wrong time in the cycle we had invested too quickly and when the cycle turned, you know, we... When I joined Permira I remember sitting in ...

Actually, it was Tom had put up a slide and he put the fund mark up and I thought it was a typo.

The organization you know, we didn't lose anyone. The investors, the partners dug deep into their own pockets as we, we sort of had a down round in terms of the next fund cycle.

We held the keys to our businesses, we monetized at the right time, we did some great investing in the rest of that fund. Actually, things like Renaissance Learning and Ancestry were part of that part of that fund too. That fund ended up emerging as a top quartile fund.

Alison Mass: Wow. That's spectacular. That's great.

Dipan Patel: And we got better out of that. We also, you know, pivoted our strategy at that time to much higher quality businesses, resilience, growth, structural growth. And that's the core of our strategy today that we prosecute through our sectors.

And so, yeah, I mean, culture for me, and that's the thing that I'm most focused on, probably those two things. One is not running into that Lehman, Arthur Andersen problem, right? So having the confidence to know what you do and do well and drive deeper and deeper into that.

And always reevaluating first principles, whether what you're in and doing is the right thing on, on the one hand, and then making sure we've got an organization that is able to not just endure but come out of stressful situations in a better place.

Alison Mass: Yeah. So, it's like confidence with humility.

Alison Mass: So that culture also expresses itself beyond your portfolio, and Permira has made a significant commitment to philanthropy through its foundation. How did that initiative begin, and what makes it important to the firm today?

Dipan Patel: We set up the Permira Foundation 10 years ago. We back today about 35 organizations, 80% of the professionals in our organization have donated significant time and are donating significant time pro bono to these organizations. So it's really important culturally for us. We just took the decision this year to make the foundation a permanent carry holder in our funds.

Dipan Patel: So we think we're one of the very few firms maybe the only firm that at least I know of that has done that. And that's, it's quite a big ask to go to our partners and say, you know, permanently we want this foundation to be aligned with the outcomes that we drive.

So yeah, it's you know, important thing. Thank you for asking about it because we never really get to talk about it, but it is important inside our organization. We do talk about it, and most often we only talk about it inside our, inside our business.

Alison Mass: Yeah. Well, it's, you're showing a lot of leadership in the industry. I have not heard of anyone putting carry in their foundation. That's fantastic. So, you and Brian are part of a new generation of private equity leaders.

Alison Mass: And looking across the industry more broadly, where do you think your generation of leaders will take private equity over the next decade?

Dipan Patel: It's a great question. I mean, look, the industry is bifurcating, right? That's no secret, and you have two very distinct business models emerging, and you have people that are generally private, generally very narrow, and deep in what they do, and they live or die on whether they perform or not.

And there are pluses and minuses to that model. And then there are firms that are building their businesses through newer and newer business lines scaling their products, and breadth is really important to those firms. The retail channel is really important to those firms, but it's like a different set of considerations.

I can't speak to both. I can only really speak to what we're doing, and probably what the set of people new, leadership in this part of the world are thinking about. I'm just really excited about a really simple thing, which is building an organization with a really distinct investing culture.

It becomes the talent magnet for people that want to be craftspeople and just generating superior outcomes over the long term and doing that consistently. And that is no mean feat. That's really hard to do. It requires just a persistent level of dissatisfaction with every single part of your business, and just constantly turning stones up and asking why we can't be better, and pushing, and investing and thinking long term.

Being willing to skate to where the puck is going, not where it is today. Those things are easy to say. They're really hard to do and force yourself to do every day. But I've been with the firm 17years. I'd love to be with the firm another 17 years. And Brian, I know feels the same way, and I think that's what we're most excited about doing.

So, on a personal level, you grew up in an immigrant family and watched your father scale a business from the ground up.

Alison Mass: How did that first-hand look at entrepreneurship shape your worldview and your approach to backing founders today?

Dipan Patel: My dad, he came into the country in his probably mid-20s. Had a single store long story short, scaled that to about 60 stores. In really, like, prime locations across London. These are grocery stores.

Did a very small P2P, public to private, in the middle of that sold that business to Tesco in 2000, he found another business scaled that over about 20 years sold that to Apax France a roll-up they were doing there.

And, you know, he's 75 now, and he's looking for the next thing to do. I think I was relatively kind of street smart probably from an early age just from seeing that kind of stuff ground up I also just developed an empathy for founders.

I'm not a founder and actually my dad always tells me that. I won't ever understand what that really means to go to bed at night and have on your shoulders an organization in that way. I think that's just a completely different thing.

But the grit, just the sheer work ethic, of just watching that was huge. The sort of the risk-taking and the calibration of that risk-taking and the confidence and paranoia that that takes you know, it stuck with me.

Alison Mass: Makes total sense. Really an impressive entrepreneurial background.

Alison Mass: It's fabulous. So I like to end these conversations with a lightning round.

Alison Mass: Just ask you some short-answer questions. So what do you think your personal greatest strength is as an investor?

Dipan Patel: I'd say knowing what I don't know and knowing where to get it.

Alison Mass: Okay. What was the very first investment you ever made?

Dipan Patel: That was actually before Renaissance Learning. In another private equity firm that I started with, there was a company called Sagem. It was a carve-out from Siemens

Alison Mass: What's the best piece of advice you've ever received?

Dipan Patel: I think in the investing sphere probably I always think about the Howard, I think it was Howard Marks' phrase "The four most dangerous words in investing are 'this time is different.'"

Alison Mass: We talked about that earlier with your investment committee. How do you spend your time out of the office?

Dipan Patel: I've got three kids, 9, 11, 13, and you know, I mean, this job is, it's seven days a week, and it's very intense. And so virtually all my time I try and spend with my wife and my kids.

That's the first priority. If I'm not doing that, I love sport. I love live sport. I'm a season ticket holder at Liverpool. I've traveled the length and breadth of the country and countries to follow the team, and that's the most likely place you'll find me is Anfield if I'm not with my family.

Dipan Patel: I think Chris Hohn probably for the way he thinks. Buffett for his temperament. Probably Munger in the same breath, and Howard Marks for sort of like risk management. So yeah, the standard greats I would say.

Alison Mass: Yeah. Well, very impressive investors. And finally, what are you most excited about in the world right now?

Dipan Patel: The whole thing. Everything we talked about. It's a great time to be alive.

Alison Mass: Yeah. Anyway, Dipan, thank you so much for joining me. Thank you. This was a great conversation.

Alison Mass: Thank you all for listening to this episode of Goldman Sachs Exchange's Great Investors, which was recorded on July 28th, 2026. I'm Alison Mass. If you enjoyed this show, we hope you'll follow us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or YouTube, or wherever you listen to your podcasts, and leave us a rating and a comment.

机构免责声明
The opinions and views expressed herein are as of the date of publication, subject to change without notice, and may not necessarily reflect the institutional views of Goldman Sachs or its affiliates. The material provided is intended for informational purposes only, and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation from any Goldman Sachs entity to take any particular action, or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any securities or financial products. This material may contain forward-looking statements. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Neither Goldman Sachs nor any of its affiliates make any representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the statements or information contained herein and disclaim any liability whatsoever for reliance on such information for any purpose. Each name of a third-party organization mentioned is the property of the company to which it relates, is used here strictly for informational and identification purposes only and is not used to imply any ownership or license rights between any such company and Goldman Sachs. A transcript is provided for convenience and may differ from the original video or audio content. Goldman Sachs is not responsible for any errors in the transcript. This material should not be copied, distributed, published, or reproduced in whole or in part or disclosed by any recipient to any other person without the express written consent of Goldman Sachs. ⁠
预览 PDF

正在载入文档……

本页如何生成

本页的结论、论点、数字与风险由 Tlines 从 Goldman Sachs 于 2026/09/04 发布的研报中提取并结构化,用于横向比较。机构原文可通过本页来源链接访问。最后更新于 2026/10/17。方法论 · 来源政策 · AI 使用说明 · 申请更正