Deutsche Bank · 09/04/2026
Equity Portfolio - Finanzportfolioverwaltung unter Berücksichtigung von Nachhaltigkeitskriterien bei der Auswahl der Finanzinstrumente
Official source ↗Automated quality noticeThis report remains available, but its AI analysis or translation scored below the preferred quality threshold and is queued for improvement. Verify material decisions against the official source.
The report
Loading the document…
AI analysis
AI-generated from the report above · not a translation and not the institution's wording · verify against the official source
Key arguments
- The product promotes environmental and social characteristics but does not aim for sustainable investments under SFDR.
- Minimum MSCI ESG rating of 'A' is required for inclusion, with exceptions for emerging market issuers and certain funds requiring 'BBB'.
- Exclusions apply for issuers violating international norms, active in critical business fields, or states rated 'not free' by Freedom House.
- Principal adverse impacts are addressed through exclusions for thermal coal (>5% revenue), unconventional oil/gas, UN Global Compact/OECD violations, and controversial weapons.
- At least 51% of the portfolio (excluding cash) must consider principal adverse impacts.
- Up to 100% of assets may be held in cash or non-ESG instruments under special market conditions.
- The bank relies solely on MSCI positive lists and does not conduct external ESG compliance reviews.
- Data limitations may constrain the extent to which ESG criteria are met.
Risks
- MSCI ESG ratings and positive lists may be incorrect or incomplete, limiting the achievement of ESG criteria.
- Data availability from fund companies and issuers is not guaranteed, especially regarding principal adverse impacts.
- The bank does not monitor MSCI's compliance with ESG criteria and does not conduct external reviews.
- EU taxonomy alignment may fluctuate significantly over time.
- Under special market conditions, up to 100% of assets may be held in cash or non-ESG instruments, potentially undermining ESG objectives.