The precious metal has suffered a sell-off during the Middle East war but the outlook is more positive.
Suki Cooper Global Head, Commodities Research
This article was originally published on FT.com.
Gold’s haven status is being questioned — again. Prices have fallen sharply since the start of the Middle East conflict, dropping about 12 per cent.
This has contradicted the view of gold as a haven asset that provides stability (or appreciates) at times of market distress, heightened uncertainty or geopolitical tensions. However, I believe gold’s status remains intact even as it switches roles in the short term and expect prices to test.
Gold can play both the headliner and a supporting role in markets. However, this does not mean gold has lost its traditional role.
In periods of distress, investors rotate between assets and stock market losses trigger calls for more margin collateral on trades. Gold is one of very few assets that can be called upon to provide liquidity without incurring losses.
Historically, such liquidity needs have tended to weigh on gold for four to six weeks after a crisis event; once those needs become less acute, investors rebuild gold exposure. This process can take longer in the event of a prolonged crisis — during the global financial crisis, for example, it took gold more than four months to retrace losses.
While gold has fallen more sharply this time than during past geopolitical shocks, particularly conflicts in the Middle East, there are reasons for this divergence.
Gold prices scaled record highs in January, taking the exchange-traded products that track them to new peaks as investor demand surged. This made gold a prime candidate for selling. The differential of spot prices over the 50-day moving average surged in January to levels last seen in 1999. Now, the reverse is true — spot prices have fallen below the 50-day moving average, and the gap is the largest since 2013. Gold went from overbought territory in January to oversold since the start of the conflict.