While the threat of the strait’s closure had lingered for years, it had never been fully tested until now, notes Philippe Dauba-Pantanacce, Global Head of Geopolitical Analysis and Senior Economist, Standard Chartered.
“After this war, no one will look at the strait in the same manner and there could be some economic scarring that will follow,” he adds, noting that regional actors will now prioritise policies and investments as a hedge against this vulnerability.
The conflict has triggered systematic stress from upstream production to downstream delivery as “alternative export routes aren’t as secure as previously thought as,” says Emily Ashford, Head of Energy Research, Standard Chartered.
Prices of crude and related products are expected to remain elevated for longer which, along with high insurance costs and shipping delays, will impact trade flows.
The longer-term range for oil has shifted higher, with USD 70 per barrel of oil potentially acting as a new floor and any further escalations could see prices spike towards the previous high of USD 119.50 per barrel of oil seen on 9 March.
In the longer term we expect prices to remain at a premium over their pre-conflict values, related to the lag in returning supplies and associated logistics. On the natural gas front, European benchmark prices could move above EUR 80/MWh if the conflict continues into the injection season when storage facilities are refilled in preparation for the winter.
In the long run, however, it’s our view that the war could lead to an increase in alternative pipelines out of the Gulf to reduce reliance on the Strait of Hormuz, and an increased focus on energy security and maintaining larger strategic reserves.